dc.contributor.author | Frost, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Rait, G | |
dc.contributor.author | Aw, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Brunskill, G | |
dc.contributor.author | Wilcock, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Robinson, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Knapp, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Hogan, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Harrison Dening, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Allan, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Manthorpe, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Walters, K | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-02T14:44:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-09-10 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: Concentrating post-diagnostic dementia care in primary care may lead to better and
more cost-effective care closer to home. We aimed to assess which intervention components and
contextual factors may contribute to the successful delivery and implementation of primary care-led
post-diagnostic dementia care.
Methods: Mixed-methods systematic review. We searched five databases (inception-March 2019)
with reference list screening and citation tracking. We included studies evaluating post-diagnostic
dementia care interventions where primary care had a significant role in dementia care, which
assessed one or more implementation elements (acceptability, feasibility, adoption, sustainability,
reach, costs, appropriateness or fidelity). Two authors independently critically appraised studies.
Results: Out of 4528 unique references, we screened 380 full texts and included 49 evaluations of
services collecting implementation process data. Most services had high acceptability ratings. The
most acceptable components were information provision, social and emotional support and links to
community organisations. Feasibility was chiefly influenced by provider engagement and leadership,
building dementia care capacity, sufficient resources/funding and collaboration. Care quality was
maximised through adding capacity from a dementia-specific health professional. On the basis of
limited data, costs for various primary care-led models did not substantially differ from each other.
Conclusion: A range of primary care-led dementia care models appear feasible and acceptable.
Future services should: add dementia-focussed health professionals into primary care, develop
primary care leadership and provide sufficient funding and collaboration opportunities. Information,
community service links and social and ongoing support should be part of services. Further
exploration of service reach and formalised fidelity assessment are needed. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Alzheimer’s Society | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 10 September 2020 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/13607863.2020.1818182 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 331 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | NF-SI-0616-10054 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/122686 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis (Routledge) | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Under embargo until 10 September 2021 in compliance with publisher policy | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group | |
dc.title | Implementing post diagnostic dementia care in primary care: A mixed-methods systematic review | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-02T14:44:09Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1360-7863 | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Taylor & Francis via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Aging and Mental Health | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2020-08-28 | |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2020-08-28 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2020-09-02T11:15:21Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-09-09T23:00:00Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |