Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCampbell, SM
dc.contributor.authorBell, BG
dc.contributor.authorMarsden, K
dc.contributor.authorSpencer, R
dc.contributor.authorKadam, U
dc.contributor.authorPerryman, K
dc.contributor.authorRodgers, S
dc.contributor.authorLitchfield, I
dc.contributor.authorReeves, D
dc.contributor.authorChuter, A
dc.contributor.authorDoos, L
dc.contributor.authorRicci-Cabello, I
dc.contributor.authorGill, P
dc.contributor.authorEsmail, A
dc.contributor.authorGreenfield, S
dc.contributor.authorSlight, S
dc.contributor.authorMiddleton, K
dc.contributor.authorBarnett, J
dc.contributor.authorMoore, M
dc.contributor.authorValderas, JM
dc.contributor.authorSheikh, A
dc.contributor.authorAvery, AJ
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-09T15:29:53Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-30
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Major gaps remain in our understanding of primary care patient safety. We describe a toolkit for measuring patient safety in family practices. METHODS: Six tools were used in 46 practices. These tools were as follows: National Health Service Education for Scotland Trigger Tool, National Health Service Education for Scotland Medicines Reconciliation Tool, Primary Care Safequest, Prescribing Safety Indicators, Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care, and Concise Safe Systems Checklist. RESULTS: Primary Care Safequest showed that most practices had a well-developed safety climate. However, the trigger tool revealed that a quarter of events identified were associated with moderate or substantial harm, with a third originating in primary care and avoidable. Although medicines reconciliation was undertaken within 2 days in more than 70% of cases, necessary discussions with a patient/carer did not always occur. The prescribing safety indicators identified 1435 instances of potentially hazardous prescribing or lack of recommended monitoring (from 92,649 patients). The Concise Safe Systems Checklist found that 25% of staff thought that their practice provided inadequate follow-up for vulnerable patients discharged from hospital and inadequate monitoring of noncollection of prescriptions. Most patients had a positive perception of the safety of their practice although 45% identified at least one safety problem in the past year. CONCLUSIONS: Patient safety is complex and multidimensional. The Patient Safety Toolkit is easy to use and hosted on a single platform with a collection of tools generating practical and actionable information. It enables family practices to identify safety deficits that they can review and change procedures to improve their patient safety across a key sets of patient safety issues.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 16 (3), pp. e182 - e186en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/PTS.0000000000000471
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/123176
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Health, Inc. / National Patient Safety Foundationen_GB
dc.rights© 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.en_GB
dc.subjectprimary careen_GB
dc.subjectpatient safetyen_GB
dc.subjectsafety climateen_GB
dc.titleA Patient Safety Toolkit for Family Practicesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-10-09T15:29:53Z
dc.identifier.issn1549-8417
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Patient Safetyen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-09-30
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-10-09T15:20:10Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2020-10-09T15:29:58Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.depositExceptionpublishedGoldOA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0
(CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work
provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or
used commercially without permission from the journal.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.