Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTulloch, J
dc.contributor.authorAkrami, M
dc.contributor.authorZamani, R
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-06T09:14:44Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-02
dc.description.abstractDiabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a serious complication for people with diabetes. They result in increased morbidity and pressures on health system resources. Developments in machine learning (ML) offer an opportunity for improved care of individuals at risk of DFUs, to identify and synthesise evidence about the current uses and accuracy of ML in the interventional care and management of DFUs, and, to provide a reference for areas of future research. PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science and Scopus were searched using the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) guidelines for papers involving ML and DFUs. In order to be included, studies needed to mention ML, DFUs, and report relevant outcome measures regarding ML algorithm accuracy. Bias in included studies was assessed using the quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy (QUADAS2). 37 out of 3769 papers were included after applying eligibility criteria. Included papers reported accuracy measures for multiple types of ML algorithms in DFU studies. Whilst varying across the ML algorithm used, all studies reported at least 90% accuracy compared to gold standards using a minimum of one reported ML algorithm for processing or recording data. Applications where ML had positive effects on DFU data analysis and outcomes include image segmentation and classification, raw data analysis and risk assessment. ML offers an effective and accurate solution to guide analysis and procurement of data from interventions which are designed for the care of DFUs in small samples and study conditions. Current research is limited, and, for the development of more applicable ML algorithms, future research should address the following: direct comparison of ML applications with current standards of care, health economic analyses and large scale data collection. There is currently no evidence to confidently suggest that ML methods in DFU diagnosis are ready for implementation and use in healthcare settings.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 2 November 2020en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3035327
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/123507
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)en_GB
dc.rights© 2020. Open access. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dc.subjectDiabetesen_GB
dc.subjectdiabetic footen_GB
dc.subjectmachine learningen_GB
dc.subjectreviewen_GB
dc.subjectulcersen_GB
dc.titleMachine learning in the prevention, diagnosis and management of diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic reviewen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-11-06T09:14:44Z
dc.identifier.issn2169-3536
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from IEEE via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.identifier.journalIEEE Accessen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-10-14
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-11-02
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-11-05T16:19:10Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2020-11-06T09:14:48Z
refterms.panelBen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2020. Open access. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2020. Open access. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/