Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFuster, F
dc.contributor.authorKaiser-Bunbury, CN
dc.contributor.authorTraveset, A
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-12T10:14:28Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-26
dc.description.abstractPremise: Opportunistic nectar-feeders may act as effective pollinators; nonetheless, we still lack information on whether these opportunistic species differ in their pollination effectiveness from specialized nectarivorous vertebrates and insects. Many nectar specialists have coevolved with the plants on which they feed; therefore, we would expect higher pollination effectiveness in specialists than in opportunistic feeders. Here, we assessed quantity and quality components of pollination effectiveness in specialist and opportunistic vertebrate nectarivores and insects, focusing on three plants from the Seychelles: Thespesia populnea, Polyscias crassa, and Syzygium wrightii. Methods: We determined the quantity component (QNC) of pollination effectiveness with pollinator observations, and the quality component (QLC) by measuring fruit and seed set resulting from single visits by each pollinator. To detect potential negative effects of invasive ants on native plant-pollinator interactions, we classified pollinator visits (quantity component) as disturbed (>6 ants/30 min) vs. undisturbed. Results: All focal plants were visited by insects, and vertebrate specialist and opportunist nectarivores, yet their pollination effectiveness differed. Flying insects were the most effective pollinators of T. populnea. The other two plants were most effectively pollinated by vertebrates; i.e., sunbirds (nectar specialists) in S. wrightii and Phelsuma geckos (nectar opportunists) in P. crassa, despite marked variation in QNC and QLC. Ant presence was associated with lower pollinator visitation rate in P. crassa and S. wrightii. Conclusions: Our study highlights the importance of all pollinator guilds, including opportunist nectarivorous vertebrates as pollinators of island plants, and the vulnerability of such interactions to disruption by nonnative species.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipSpanish Governmenten_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipGerman Research Foundationen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 107 (7), pp. 957 - 969en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ajb2.1499
dc.identifier.grantnumberCGL2013-44386-Pen_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberCGL2017-88122-Pen_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberBES-2014-068207en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberKA 3349/2‐1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberKA 3349/3‐1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/123588
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBotanical Society of Americaen_GB
dc.rights© 2020 Botanical Society of Americaen_GB
dc.subjectAraliaceaeen_GB
dc.subjectArideen_GB
dc.subjectisland ecosystemsen_GB
dc.subjectMahéen_GB
dc.subjectMalvaceaeen_GB
dc.subjectmutualistic disruptionen_GB
dc.subjectMyrtaceaeen_GB
dc.subjectopportunistic pollinationen_GB
dc.subjecttropical ecosystemsen_GB
dc.subjectvertebrate pollinationen_GB
dc.titlePollination effectiveness of specialist and opportunistic nectar feeders influenced by invasive alien ants in the Seychellesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-11-12T10:14:28Z
dc.identifier.issn2168-0450
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the Botanical Society of America via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalAmerican Journal of Botanyen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-03-27
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-06-26
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-11-12T10:11:45Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2020-11-12T10:14:39Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record