Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSimmons, BI
dc.contributor.authorBeckerman, AP
dc.contributor.authorHansen, K
dc.contributor.authorMaruyama, PK
dc.contributor.authorTelevantos, C
dc.contributor.authorVizentin-Bugoni, J
dc.contributor.authorDalsgaard, B
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-03T14:50:14Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-05
dc.description.abstractIndirect interactions are central to ecological and evolutionary dynamics in pollination communities, yet we have little understanding about the processes determining patterns of indirect interactions, such as those between pollinators through shared flowering plants. Instead, research has concentrated on the processes responsible for direct interactions and whole-network structures. This is partly due to a lack of appropriate tools for characterising indirect interaction structures, because traditional network metrics discard much of this information. The recent development of tools for counting motifs (subnetworks depicting interactions between a small number of species) in bipartite networks enable detailed analysis of indirect interaction patterns. Here we generate plant-hummingbird pollination networks based on three major assembly processes – neutral effects (species interacting in proportion to abundance), morphological matching and phenological overlap – and evaluate the motifs associated with each one. We find that different processes produce networks with significantly different patterns of indirect interactions. Neutral effects tend to produce densely-connected motifs, with short indirect interaction chains, and motifs where many specialists interact indirectly through a single generalist. Conversely, niche-based processes (morphology and phenology) produced motifs with a core of interacting generalists, supported by peripheral specialists. These results have important implications for understanding the processes determining indirect interaction structures.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipRoyal Commission 1851en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDanish National Research Foundationen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 35 (3), pp. 753 - 763en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1365-2435.13736
dc.identifier.grantnumberRF511/2019en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/S001395/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberDNRF96en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/123897
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWiley / British Ecological Societyen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.dncjsxkw2en_GB
dc.rights© 2020 British Ecological Society. Open access article
dc.subjectmotifsen_GB
dc.subjecthummingbirden_GB
dc.subjectpollinationen_GB
dc.subjectplant-pollinator networken_GB
dc.titleNiche and neutral processes leave distinct structural imprints on indirect interactions in mutualistic networksen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-12-03T14:50:14Z
dc.identifier.issn0269-8463
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability: All data used in this analysis are publicly available from https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.dncjsxkw2 (Sonne et al., 2020a, 2020b)en_GB
dc.identifier.journalFunctional Ecologyen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-11-11
exeter.funder::Royal Commission 1851en_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-11-11
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-12-03T12:05:02Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2021-03-12T12:49:02Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record