In this paper we present the importance of detailing the contextual conditions of a qualitative study to
highlight any potential participant-researcher tensions. We emphasize the importance of understanding
context in rich detail to expose societal complexities while maintaining positive participant-research
rapport. Through two ...
In this paper we present the importance of detailing the contextual conditions of a qualitative study to
highlight any potential participant-researcher tensions. We emphasize the importance of understanding
context in rich detail to expose societal complexities while maintaining positive participant-research
rapport. Through two cases, this paper considers that bracketing, reflexivity, and transparency can be
applied to form appropriate strategies to deal with external disruptions to qualitative fieldwork. The cases
draw on Brexit’s impact on two studies conducted in the United Kingdom. In so doing, we argue that time,
relevance, and the individuals involved can coalesce to express varied influences on a study. Thus,
bracketing, reflexivity and transparency become vital to dealing with such influences; particularly when
they are disruptive to a study. Overall, the strategic approach outlined by this paper can be used to
maximise awareness of potential sources of tension in the field and to deal with any tensions that do
arise.
