Soil C, N and P cycling enzyme responses to nutrient limitation under elevated CO2
dc.contributor.author | Keane, JB | |
dc.contributor.author | Hoosbeek, MR | |
dc.contributor.author | Taylor, CR | |
dc.contributor.author | Miglietta, F | |
dc.contributor.author | Phoenix, GK | |
dc.contributor.author | Hartley, IP | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-12-07T13:07:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-11-10 | |
dc.description.abstract | Elevated CO2 (eCO2) can stimulate plant productivity and increase carbon (C) input to soils, but nutrient limitation restricts productivity. Despite phosphorus (P)-limited ecosystems increasing globally, it is unknown how nutrient cycling, particularly soil microbial extra cellular enzyme activity (EEA), will respond to eCO2 in such ecosystems. Long-term nutrient manipulation plots from adjacent P-limited acidic and limestone grasslands were exposed to eCO2 (600 ppm) provided by a mini-Free Air CO2 Enrichment system. P-limitation was alleviated (35 kg-P ha−1 y−1 (P35)), exacerbated (35 kg-N ha−1 y−1 (N35), 140 kg-N ha−1 y−1 (N140)), or maintained (control (P0N0)) for > 20 years. We measured EEAs of C-, N- and P-cycling enzymes (1,4-β-glucosidase, cellobiohydrolase, N-acetyl β-D-glucosaminidase, leucine aminopeptidase, and acid phosphatase) and compared C:N:P cycling enzyme ratios using a vector analysis. Potential acid phosphatase activity doubled under N additions relative to P0N0 and P35 treatments. Vector analysis revealed reduced C-cycling investment and increased P-cycling investment under eCO2. Vector angle significantly increased with P-limitation (P35 < P0N0 < N35 < N140) indicating relatively greater investment in P-cycling enzymes. The limestone grassland was more C limited than the acidic grassland, characterised by increased vector length, C:N and C:P enzyme ratios. The absence of interactions between grassland type and eCO2 or nutrient treatment for all enzyme indicators signaled consistent responses to changing P-limitation and eCO2 in both grasslands. Our findings suggest that eCO2 reduces C limitation, allowing increased investment in P- and N-cycle enzymes with implications for rates of nutrient cycling, potentially alleviating nutrient limitation of ecosystem productivity under eCO2. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 151, pp. 221–235 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10533-020-00723-1 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | NE/N0100086/1 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | NE/N010132/1 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/123935 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://eidc.ac.uk/ | en_GB |
dc.rights | ©The Author(s) 2020. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dc.title | Soil C, N and P cycling enzyme responses to nutrient limitation under elevated CO2 | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2020-12-07T13:07:36Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0168-2563 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from Springer via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.description | Data availability: Data will be available from the Environmental Information Data Centre, https://eidc.ac.uk/ | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Biogeochemistry | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2020-10-30 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2020-11-10 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2020-12-07T13:04:29Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2020-12-07T13:07:42Z | |
refterms.panel | C | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as ©The Author(s) 2020. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/