Evaluating enhanced recovery after surgery: time to cover new ground and discover the missing patient voice
dc.contributor.author | Nunns, M | |
dc.contributor.author | John, JB | |
dc.contributor.author | McGrath, JS | |
dc.contributor.author | Shaw, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Briscoe, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Thompson Coon, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Hemsley, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Lovegrove, CJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Thomas, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Mythen, MG | |
dc.contributor.author | Anderson, R | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-12-17T13:02:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-09-14 | |
dc.description.abstract | Multicomponent peri-operative interventions offer to accelerate patient recovery and improve cost-effectiveness. The recent National Institute of Health Research-commissioned evidence synthesis review by Nunns et al. considers the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of all types of multicomponent interventions for older adults undergoing elective inpatient surgery. Enhanced recovery programmes (ERPs) were the most commonly evaluated intervention. An association between ERPs and decreased length of stay was observed, whilst complication rates and time to recovery were static or sometimes reduced. Important areas which lack research in the context of ERPs are patient-reported outcome measures, patients with complex needs and assessment of factors pertaining to successful ERP implementation. The next generation of ERP studies should seek to develop our understanding in these key areas. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 9, article 27 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s13741-020-00157-1 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | NIHR127747 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/124189 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | BMC | en_GB |
dc.rights | © The Author(s). 2020. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. | en_GB |
dc.subject | Enhanced recovery after surgery | en_GB |
dc.subject | ERAS | en_GB |
dc.subject | ERP | en_GB |
dc.subject | Prehabilitation | en_GB |
dc.subject | Rehabilitation | en_GB |
dc.subject | Elective surgery | en_GB |
dc.subject | Meta-analysis | en_GB |
dc.subject | Recovery | en_GB |
dc.subject | Complications | en_GB |
dc.subject | Elderly | en_GB |
dc.title | Evaluating enhanced recovery after surgery: time to cover new ground and discover the missing patient voice | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2020-12-17T13:02:41Z | |
exeter.article-number | ARTN 27 | en_GB |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from BMC via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.description | Availability of data and materials: The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2047-0525 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Perioperative Medicine | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2020-08-24 | |
exeter.funder | ::National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) | en_GB |
exeter.funder | ::National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) | en_GB |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2020-09-14 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2020-12-17T12:58:37Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2020-12-17T13:02:47Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
refterms.depositException | publishedGoldOA |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s). 2020. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,
which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give
appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if
changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons
licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons
licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain
permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the
data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.