Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAuster, RE
dc.contributor.authorBarr, S
dc.contributor.authorBrazier, R
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-06T16:59:18Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-16
dc.description.abstractEurasian beaver (Castor fiber) reintroduction is taking place in England with potential benefits for flood alleviation and biodiversity; however there is also opposition. One area of controversy relates to fish and fishing. A previous meta-analysis of research into beaver-fish relationships found perceived benefits of beavers amongst fish and beaver “experts” included increased fish abundance and productivity, whilst perceived negatives included impeded fish passage and reduced spawning habitat availability. We further this understanding using Q-Methodology (a social science technique) to reveal three nuanced and contrasting perspectives that exist amongst the angling community in the catchment of a trial reintroduction. Due to a conflict potential between groups, we suggest management themes to help reduce this where reintroduction occurs: open, cross-sectoral dialogue about research into beaver-fish relationships and management; a management strategy which supports ecosystem benefits whilst providing a sense of empowerment for individuals to respond to negative impacts.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDevon Wildlife Trusten_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipPlymouth City Councilen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipCornwall Wildlife Trusten_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 16 December 2020en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09640568.2020.1816933
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/124317
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s). This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. en_GB
dc.subjectanglingen_GB
dc.subjectEurasian beaveren_GB
dc.subjectperceptionsen_GB
dc.subjectQ-Methodologyen_GB
dc.subjectreintroductionen_GB
dc.titleAlternative perspectives of the angling community on Eurasian beaver (Castor fiber) reintroduction in the River Otter Beaver Trialen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-01-06T16:59:18Z
dc.identifier.issn0964-0568
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Routledge via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1360-0559
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Environmental Planning and Managementen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-08-26
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-12-16
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-01-06T16:54:00Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2021-01-06T16:59:25Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s). This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. 
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s). This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.