Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDavies, R
dc.contributor.authorYi, N
dc.contributor.authorMcCutchion, P
dc.contributor.authorGhita, O
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-13T09:25:37Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-07
dc.description.abstractAmongst additive manufacturing processes, fused filament fabrication (FFF) is one of the most affordable and cost efficient technologies that can produce complex shaped components with an increasing number of printable polymers such as the polyaryletherketone (PAEK) family, polyetherimide (PEI), and polyphenylene sulfide (PPS). Despite the gain in popularity, there is a lack of standardization in specimen's preparation and mechanical testing of FFF samples. This study investigates the effect of different methods of printing vertical tensile specimens on the mechanical properties whilst the material and the printing parameters are fixed. A slow crystallising polyetheretherketone (PEKK) grade was selected as the printing material to exclude the effect of crystallisation on the interlayer bonding strength, leaving the temperature‐dependent amorphous molecular diffusion across the layers as the governing mechanism. Vertical tensile specimens made by four printing methods: individually printed, machined, and connected (based on ISO 527‐2‐1A and ISO 527‐2‐1BA) were assessed. Individually printed vertical specimens were found to have the highest mean tensile strength, owing to the high level of diffusion induced by the very short layer time. The strengths of specimens printed via the other three methods are less sensitive to the effect of layer time, due to the rate of change during cooling and its relationship with the local temperature at the interlayer surface. This study highlights the importance of the disclosure of FFF printing methods along with any reported mechanical data.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 7 January 2021en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pi.6172
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/124380
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWiley / Society of Chemical Industryen_GB
dc.rights© 2021 The Authors. Polymer International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_GB
dc.subjectPoly Aryl Ether Ketoneen_GB
dc.subjectFused filament fabricationen_GB
dc.subjectMechanical testingen_GB
dc.subjectPrinting methoden_GB
dc.titleMechanical property variance amongst vertical fused filament fabricated specimens via four different printing methodsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-01-13T09:25:37Z
dc.identifier.issn0959-8103
exeter.article-numberpi.6172en_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalPolymer Internationalen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-01-03
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-01-07
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-01-13T09:24:11Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2021-01-13T09:25:54Z
refterms.panelBen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2021 The Authors. Polymer International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2021 The Authors. Polymer International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.