dc.contributor.author | Clark, CE | |
dc.contributor.author | Masoli, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Warren, FC | |
dc.contributor.author | Soothill, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Campbell, JL | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-19T08:53:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-12-28 | |
dc.description.abstract | The current global pandemic of SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus infection originated in Wuhan, China, during December 2019; over 50 million cases have been diagnosed to date. Older age and comorbidity have proven to be key markers of risk for severity of COVID-19 and mortality,1,2 and residents of care homes have been proven to be at high risk. The Office for National Statistics has recorded 16 111 deaths related to COVID-19 in care home residents in England up to 20 November 2020.3 In the first wave of the pandemic, 46% of all excess deaths in England and Wales up to 7 August occurred in care homes.4 Older age is associated with increasing prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, which can affect up to 40% of care home residents.5 There is considerable overlap between the non-modifiable risk factors for severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and those associated with deficiency of vitamin D. For example, age, ethnicity, diabetes, and chronic pulmonary and cardiac diseases; in addition, there is the observed trend towards greater severity of disease in northern latitudes. While these could imply an association between reduced vitamin D levels and susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection this may simply be an ecological fallacy.6 Therefore, it is important to understand the strength of evidence provided by epidemiological and observational studies of COVID-19, and compare it with what is known from clinical trials of the impact of vitamin D supplementation on acute respiratory infections, including those due to SARS-CoV-2. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 71 (702), pp. 10 - 11 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3399/bjgp21X714377 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | DRF-2014-07-177 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.other | bjgp21X714377 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/124427 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Royal College of General Practitioners | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33355153 | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Under embargo until 28 December 2021 in compliance with publisher policy | en_GB |
dc.rights | © British Journal of General Practice 2021 | en_GB |
dc.title | Vitamin D and COVID-19 in older age: evidence versus expectations | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-19T08:53:44Z | |
exeter.place-of-publication | England | en_GB |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the Royal College of General Practitioners via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | British Journal of General Practice | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved | en_GB |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2020-12-28 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2021-01-19T08:51:17Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-12-28T00:00:00Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |