Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClark, CE
dc.contributor.authorMasoli, J
dc.contributor.authorWarren, FC
dc.contributor.authorSoothill, J
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, JL
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-19T08:53:44Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-28
dc.description.abstractThe current global pandemic of SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus infection originated in Wuhan, China, during December 2019; over 50 million cases have been diagnosed to date. Older age and comorbidity have proven to be key markers of risk for severity of COVID-19 and mortality,1,2 and residents of care homes have been proven to be at high risk. The Office for National Statistics has recorded 16 111 deaths related to COVID-19 in care home residents in England up to 20 November 2020.3 In the first wave of the pandemic, 46% of all excess deaths in England and Wales up to 7 August occurred in care homes.4 Older age is associated with increasing prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, which can affect up to 40% of care home residents.5 There is considerable overlap between the non-modifiable risk factors for severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and those associated with deficiency of vitamin D. For example, age, ethnicity, diabetes, and chronic pulmonary and cardiac diseases; in addition, there is the observed trend towards greater severity of disease in northern latitudes. While these could imply an association between reduced vitamin D levels and susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection this may simply be an ecological fallacy.6 Therefore, it is important to understand the strength of evidence provided by epidemiological and observational studies of COVID-19, and compare it with what is known from clinical trials of the impact of vitamin D supplementation on acute respiratory infections, including those due to SARS-CoV-2.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 71 (702), pp. 10 - 11en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.3399/bjgp21X714377
dc.identifier.grantnumberDRF-2014-07-177en_GB
dc.identifier.otherbjgp21X714377
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/124427
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherRoyal College of General Practitionersen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33355153en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 28 December 2021 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© British Journal of General Practice 2021en_GB
dc.titleVitamin D and COVID-19 in older age: evidence versus expectationsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-01-19T08:53:44Z
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the Royal College of General Practitioners via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalBritish Journal of General Practiceen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-12-28
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-01-19T08:51:17Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2021-12-28T00:00:00Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record