dc.contributor.author | Kuijper, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Johnstone, RA | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-22T11:50:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-04-19 | |
dc.description.abstract | Existing theory on the evolution of parental effects and the inheritance of nongenetic factors has mostly focused on the role of environmental change. By contrast, how differences in population demography and life history affect parental
effects is poorly understood. To fill this gap, we develop an analytical model to
explore how parental effects evolve when selection acts on fecundity versus viability in spatiotemporally fluctuating environments. We find that regimes of viability
selection, but not fecundity selection, are most likely to favour parental effects.
In case of viability selection, locally adapted phenotypes have a higher survival
than maladapted phenotypes and hence become enriched in the local environment.
Hence, simply by being alive, a parental phenotype becomes correlated to its environment (and hence informative to offspring) during its lifetime, favouring the
evolution of parental effects. By contrast, in regimes of fecundity selection, correlations between phenotype and environment develop more slowly: this is because
locally adapted and maladapted parents survive at equal rates (no survival selection), so that parental phenotypes, by themselves, are uninformative about the
local environment. However, because locally adapted parents are more fecund,
they contribute more offspring to the local patch than maladapted parents. In case
these offspring are also likely to inherit the adapted parents’ phenotypes (requiring
pre-existing inheritance), locally adapted offspring become enriched in the local
environment, resulting in a correlation between phenotype and environment, but
only in the offspring’s generation. Because of this slower build-up of a correlation between phenotype and environment essential to parental effects, fecundity
selection is more sensitive to any distortions due to environmental change than viability selection. Hence, we conclude that viability selection is most conducive to
the evolution of parental effects. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Leverhulme Trust | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 376 (1826), article 20200128 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1098/rstb.2020.0128 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | ECF 2015-273 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/124469 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Royal Society | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Under temporary indefinite embargo pending publication by the Royal Society. No embargo required on publication | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2021 The Author(s).
Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved. | |
dc.subject | parental effects | en_GB |
dc.subject | nongenetic inheritance | en_GB |
dc.subject | phenotypic plasticity | en_GB |
dc.subject | information | en_GB |
dc.subject | transgenerational effects | en_GB |
dc.subject | environmental change | en_GB |
dc.title | Evolution of epigenetic transmission when selection acts on fecundity versus viability | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-22T11:50:20Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0962-8436 | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the Royal Society via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2021-01-10 | |
exeter.funder | ::Leverhulme Trust | en_GB |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2021-01-10 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2021-01-21T21:15:45Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-05-07T09:19:43Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |