Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKuijper, A
dc.contributor.authorJohnstone, RA
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-22T11:50:20Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-19
dc.description.abstractExisting theory on the evolution of parental effects and the inheritance of nongenetic factors has mostly focused on the role of environmental change. By contrast, how differences in population demography and life history affect parental effects is poorly understood. To fill this gap, we develop an analytical model to explore how parental effects evolve when selection acts on fecundity versus viability in spatiotemporally fluctuating environments. We find that regimes of viability selection, but not fecundity selection, are most likely to favour parental effects. In case of viability selection, locally adapted phenotypes have a higher survival than maladapted phenotypes and hence become enriched in the local environment. Hence, simply by being alive, a parental phenotype becomes correlated to its environment (and hence informative to offspring) during its lifetime, favouring the evolution of parental effects. By contrast, in regimes of fecundity selection, correlations between phenotype and environment develop more slowly: this is because locally adapted and maladapted parents survive at equal rates (no survival selection), so that parental phenotypes, by themselves, are uninformative about the local environment. However, because locally adapted parents are more fecund, they contribute more offspring to the local patch than maladapted parents. In case these offspring are also likely to inherit the adapted parents’ phenotypes (requiring pre-existing inheritance), locally adapted offspring become enriched in the local environment, resulting in a correlation between phenotype and environment, but only in the offspring’s generation. Because of this slower build-up of a correlation between phenotype and environment essential to parental effects, fecundity selection is more sensitive to any distortions due to environmental change than viability selection. Hence, we conclude that viability selection is most conducive to the evolution of parental effects.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipLeverhulme Trusten_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 376 (1826), article 20200128en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1098/rstb.2020.0128
dc.identifier.grantnumberECF 2015-273en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/124469
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherRoyal Societyen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder temporary indefinite embargo pending publication by the Royal Society. No embargo required on publication  en_GB
dc.rights© 2021 The Author(s). Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectparental effectsen_GB
dc.subjectnongenetic inheritanceen_GB
dc.subjectphenotypic plasticityen_GB
dc.subjectinformationen_GB
dc.subjecttransgenerational effectsen_GB
dc.subjectenvironmental changeen_GB
dc.titleEvolution of epigenetic transmission when selection acts on fecundity versus viabilityen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-01-22T11:50:20Z
dc.identifier.issn0962-8436
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the Royal Society via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciencesen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-01-10
exeter.funder::Leverhulme Trusten_GB
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-01-10
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-01-21T21:15:45Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2021-05-07T09:19:43Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record