Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPell, D
dc.contributor.authorPenney, TL
dc.contributor.authorMytton, O
dc.contributor.authorBriggs, A
dc.contributor.authorCummins, S
dc.contributor.authorRayner, M
dc.contributor.authorRutter, H
dc.contributor.authorScarborough, P
dc.contributor.authorSharp, SJ
dc.contributor.authorSmith, RD
dc.contributor.authorWhite, M
dc.contributor.authorAdams, J
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-01T11:11:04Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-12
dc.description.abstractBackground Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption is positively associated with obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. The World Health Organization recommends that member states implement effective taxes on SSBs to reduce consumption. The United Kingdom Soft Drinks Industry Levy (SDIL) is a two-tiered tax, announced in March 2016 and implemented in April 2018. Drinks with >8 g of sugar per 100 ml (higher levy tier) are taxed at £0.24 per litre, drinks with >5 to <8 g of sugar per 100 ml (lower levy tier) are taxed at £0.18 per litre, and drinks with <5 g sugar per 100 ml (no levy) are not taxed. Milk-based drinks, pure fruit juices, drinks sold as powder, and drinks with >1.2% alcohol by volume are exempt. We aimed to determine if the announcement of the SDIL was associated with anticipatory changes in purchases of soft drinks prior to implementation of the SDIL in April 2018. We explored differences in the volume of and amount of sugar in household purchases of drinks in each levy tier at 2 years post announcement. Methods and findings We used controlled interrupted time series to compare observed changes associated with the announcement of the SDIL to the counterfactual scenario of no announcement. We used data from Kantar Worldpanel, a commercial household purchasing panel with approximately 30,000 British members that includes linked nutritional data on purchases. We conducted separate analyses for drinks liable for the SDIL in the higher, lower, and no-levy tiers controlling with household purchase volumes of toiletries. At 2 years post announcement, there was no difference in volume of or sugar from purchases of higher-levy-tier drinks compared to the counterfactual of no announcement. In contrast, a reversal of the existing upward trend in volume (ml) of and amount of sugar (g) in purchases of lower-levy-tier drinks was seen. These changes led to a −96.1 ml (95% confidence interval [CI] −144.2 to −48.0) reduction in volume and −6.4 g (95% CI −9.8 to −3.1) reduction in sugar purchased in these drinks per household per week. There was a reversal of the existing downward trend in the amount of sugar in household purchases of the no-levy drinks but no change in volume purchased. At 2 years post announcement, these changes led to a 6.1 g (95% CI 3.9–8.2) increase in sugar purchased in these drinks per household per week. There was no evidence that volume of or amount of sugar in purchases of all drinks combined was different from the counterfactual. This is an observational study, and changes other than the SDIL may have been responsible for the results reported. Purchases consumed outside of the home were not accounted for. Conclusions The announcement of the UK SDIL was associated with reductions in volume and sugar purchased in lower-levy-tier drinks before implementation. These were offset by increases in sugar purchased from no-levy drinks. These findings may reflect reformulation of drinks from the lower levy to no-levy tier with removal of some but not all sugar, alongside changes in consumer attitudes and beliefs.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipCentre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipMedical Research Council (MRC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 17 (11), article e1003269en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pmed.1003269
dc.identifier.grantnumberMC_UU_12015/6en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/124579
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://github.com/MRC-Epid/SDILEvaluationen_GB
dc.rights© 2020 Pell et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_GB
dc.titleAnticipatory changes in British household purchases of soft drinks associated with the announcement of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy: A controlled interrupted time series analysisen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-02-01T11:11:04Z
dc.identifier.issn1549-1277
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from the Public Library of Science via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData Availability: The statistical code for the analyses are available from https://github.com/MRC-Epid/SDILEvaluation. Kantar Worldpanel data are not publicly available but can be purchased from Kantar Worldpanel (http://www.kantarworldpanel.com). The authors are not legally permitted to share the data used for this study, but interested parties may contact Kantar WorldPanel representative Sean Cannon to inquire about accessing this proprietary data (Sean.Cannon@kantar.com).en_GB
dc.identifier.journalPLoS Medicineen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-09-18
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-11-12
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-02-01T11:09:05Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2021-02-01T11:11:10Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.depositExceptionpublishedGoldOA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2020 Pell et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2020 Pell et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.