Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChen, O
dc.contributor.authorHan, D
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T08:13:00Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-03
dc.description.abstractAfter a long-standing debate of pluralism in heritage conservation, the global practice has just started to broaden its view from material to people and even to nature, leading to the potential of a more comprehensive understanding and harmony between these spheres. Notwithstanding that the shift from material to people and then to nature seemingly looks like the only path in the modern heritage conservation movement to achieve the foregoing goals, in fact, there exist some regional cultures that originally featured particular views on human–nature harmony. This paper hence highlights the regional difference in heritage with a focus on China of ancient times, which unfolds the particular perspective emphasising the unity of human and nature. With a case study of Huaqing Palace of the Tang Dynasty (618–907 CE), the research is expected to be the first attempt to rediscover that the four schools of thought, Buddhism, Taoism, Confucianism and I Ching, had jointly formed a “wisdom” system of the ancient Han Chinese in shaping the idea of cultural heritage, as well as the idea of heritage conservation, which were inherited by modern Chinese without knowing and recognising it. The paper, therefore, argues that without understanding and acknowledging the significance of the ancient Han Chinese’s particular view on nature and the universe formed by the four schools of thought behind the material, it is not likely to protect and promote comprehensively their heritage value, such that the importance of cultural diversity will be just rhetoric.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNewton-Mosharafa Funden_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUK Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEgypt Science and Technology Development Fund (STDF)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 2 (3), pp. 1812-1834en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/heritage2030111
dc.identifier.grantnumber332430681en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/125023
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherMDPIen_GB
dc.rights© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_GB
dc.subjectChinese cultural heritageen_GB
dc.subjectheritage discourseen_GB
dc.subjectintangibleen_GB
dc.subjectresilienceen_GB
dc.subjectsustainabilityen_GB
dc.subjecttangibleen_GB
dc.titleRediscovering the Idea of Cultural Heritage and the Relationship with Nature: Four Schools of Essential Thought of the Ancient Han Chineseen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-03-05T08:13:00Z
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from MDPI via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.identifier.journalHeritageen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-06-28
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-06-28
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-03-05T08:06:40Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2021-03-05T08:13:08Z
refterms.panelBen_GB
refterms.depositExceptionpublishedGoldOA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).