Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBlake, S
dc.contributor.authorJanssens, A
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-10T10:53:14Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-17
dc.description.abstractStrong mutual commitment is typically conceived to involve a public promise of a lifelong bond, but social theorists have posited that external relationship anchors are being replaced with a private meaning of commitment. This narrative analysis of semistructured interviews with ten White-British couples in long-term relationships (15+ years) of different forms (married, civil partners, cohabitants) explores the meaning of commitment in contemporary relationships. The findings indicate a loss of importance attached to public promises, with couple relationships instead guided by two distinct commitment narratives, one of which rejects future-orientated promises of a life-long bond. Contrary to individualisation theories however, relationship trajectories continue to be shaped by social influences. The study raises questions regarding the growth of an alternative moral framework for relationships and suggests theoretical conceptions of commitment are reconsidered in light of changes in contemporary relationship practicesen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 17 March 2021en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1332/204674321X16135119773142
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/125084
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherPolicy Pressen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 17 March 2022 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2021 Policy Press
dc.subjectCommitmenten_GB
dc.subjectsecond demographic transitionen_GB
dc.subjectcohabitationen_GB
dc.subjectmarriageen_GB
dc.subjectcivil partnershipen_GB
dc.titleConscious coupling: loss of public promises of a life-long bond? An exploration of authenticity and autonomy in commitment processes across contemporary long-term relationship formsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-03-10T10:53:14Z
dc.identifier.issn2046-7435
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Policy Press via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2046-7443
dc.identifier.journalFamilies, Relationships and Societiesen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-02-16
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-02-16
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-03-10T10:38:59Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2022-03-17T00:00:00Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record