Threats of illegal, unregulated, and unreported fishing to biodiversity and food security in the Republic of the Congo
dc.contributor.author | Doherty, PD | |
dc.contributor.author | Atsango, BC | |
dc.contributor.author | Ngassiki, G | |
dc.contributor.author | Ngouembe, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Bréheret, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Chauvet, E | |
dc.contributor.author | Godley, BJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Machin, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Moundzoho, BD | |
dc.contributor.author | Parnell, RJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Metcalfe, K | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-10T12:37:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-02-22 | |
dc.description.abstract | Illegal, unregulated, and unreported (IUU) fishing poses a major threat to effective management of marine resources, impacting biodiversity and communities dependent on these coastal resources. Spatio-temporal patterns of industrial fisheries in developing countries are often poorly understood, with global efforts describing spatial patterns of fishing vessel activity currently based on automatic identification system (AIS) data. However, AIS is often not a legal requirement on fishing vessels, likely resulting in underestimates of the scale and distribution of legal and illegal fishing activity, which could have significant ramifications for targeted enforcement efforts and the management of fisheries resources. To help address this knowledge gap, we analysed three years of vessel monitoring system (VMS) data in partnership with the national fisheries department in the Republic of the Congo to describe the behaviour of national and distant water industrial fleets operating in these waters. We reveal the spatial footprint of the industrial fisheries fleet encompasses over one quarter of the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), with an average of 73% of fishing activity taking place on the continental shelf (waters shallower than 200 m). In addition, our findings highlight that VMS is not acting as a deterrent or being effectively used as a pro-active management tool, with as much as 33% (13% on average) of fishing effort occurring within prohibited areas set aside to protect biodiversity, including artisanal fisheries resources; with the distant water fleet (DWF) responsible for as much as 84% of this illegal activity. Given the growth in industrial and distant water fleets across the region, as well as low levels of management and enforcement, these findings highlight that there is an urgent need for the global community to help strengthen regional and national capacity to analyse national scale datasets if efforts to combat IUU fishing are to be effective. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Darwin Initiative | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Waterloo Foundation | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | WAITT Foundation | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 22 February 2021 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/cobi.13723 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 20-009/23-011/26-014 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/125085 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Wiley / Society for Conservation Biology | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33615559 | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2021 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | |
dc.subject | Africa | en_GB |
dc.subject | Illegal fishing | en_GB |
dc.subject | Industrial fisheries | en_GB |
dc.subject | distant water fleet | en_GB |
dc.subject | governance | en_GB |
dc.subject | monitoring control and surveillance | en_GB |
dc.subject | policy | en_GB |
dc.subject | vessel monitoring system | en_GB |
dc.title | Threats of illegal, unregulated, and unreported fishing to biodiversity and food security in the Republic of the Congo | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-10T12:37:43Z | |
exeter.place-of-publication | United States | en_GB |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1523-1739 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Conservation Biology | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2021-01-29 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2021-02-22 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2021-03-10T12:35:56Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-03-10T12:37:49Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2021 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.