Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilliamson, V
dc.contributor.authorLarkin, M
dc.contributor.authorReardon, T
dc.contributor.authorPearcey, S
dc.contributor.authorHill, C
dc.contributor.authorStallard, P
dc.contributor.authorSpence, SH
dc.contributor.authorBreen, M
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, I
dc.contributor.authorUkoumunne, O
dc.contributor.authorFord, T
dc.contributor.authorViolato, M
dc.contributor.authorSniehotta, F
dc.contributor.authorStainer, J
dc.contributor.authorGray, A
dc.contributor.authorBrown, P
dc.contributor.authorSancho, M
dc.contributor.authorCreswell, C
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-17T08:07:20Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-20
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Anxiety difficulties are among the most common mental health problems in childhood. Despite this, few children access evidence-based interventions and school may be an ideal setting to improve children’s access to treatment. This paper describes the design, methods, and expected data collection of the Identifying Child Anxiety Through Schools – Identification to Intervention (iCATS i2i) study which aims to develop acceptable schoolbased procedures to identify and support child anxiety difficulties. Methods and analysis: iCATS i2i will use a mixed-methods approach to co-design and deliver a set of procedures – or ‘pathway’ – to improve access to evidence-based intervention for child anxiety difficulties through primary schools in England. The study will consist of four stages, initially involving in-depth interviews with parents, children, school staff, stakeholders (Stage 1) to inform the development of the pathway. The pathway will then be administered in two primary schools, including screening, feedback to parents, and the offer of treatment where indicated (Stage 2), with participating children, parents and school staff invited to provide feedback on their experience (Stages 3 & 4). Data will be analysed using Template Analysis. Ethics and dissemination: The iCATS i2i study was approved by the University of Oxford’s Research Ethics Committee (REF R64620/RE001). It is expected that this co-design study will lead on to a future feasibility study and, if indicated, a randomised controlled trial. The findings will be disseminated in several ways, including via lay summary report, publication in academic journals and presentation at conferences. By providing information on child, parent, school-staff and other stakeholder’s experiences, we anticipate that the findings will inform the development of an acceptable evidence-based pathway for identification and intervention for children with anxiety difficulties in primary schools and may also inform 4 broader approaches to screening for and treating youth mental health problems outside of clinics. Strengths and limitations of this study:  Focus on child anxiety difficulties, one of the most common mental helath problems in childhood.  By using a co-design approach which incorporates feedback from children, parents, school-staff and stakeholders, this study will lead to the development of acceptable procedures for screening and offering treatment for child anxiety difficulties in primary schools.  The study is limited by the use of an ‘opt-in’ approach to consent which could introduce participation bias.  The primary use of online platforms for consent, screening and delivery of the CBT intervention may exclude families who have limited access to technology or lack technical skills; although ways to facilitate the participation of those in these situations will be explored.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 11, article e044852en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044852
dc.identifier.grantnumberRP-PG-0218-20010en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/125142
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_GB
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleCodesign and development of a primary school based pathway for child anxiety screening and intervention delivery: a protocol, mixed-methods feasibility studyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-03-17T08:07:20Z
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from BMJ Publishing Group via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2044-6055
dc.identifier.journalBMJ Openen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-03-12
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-03-12
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-03-13T23:32:15Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2021-05-14T10:37:52Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/