Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFlorencio, J
dc.contributor.authorMiller, B
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-31T09:26:56Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.description.abstractDespite being a widely consumed genre of visual culture, pornography remains a touchy subject in contemporary queer historiography. Queer archives overflow with it, but queer histories don’t. Historically associated with low culture and distrusted by value systems that have tended to privilege the “high” faculties of reason to the detriment of the “base” materiality of the body, its affects and appetites, porn is too rarely approached as a legitimate source with which to think cultural, affective, intellectual, and sexual histories. This article draws from porn studies and queer historiographies to draw some methodological considerations about the value, benefits, and challenges posed by porn archives to the writing of queer subcultural histories. Rather than trying to solve porn’s double ontological status as both documentary and fantasy, the authors locate in that defining feature of the genre porn’s value as a historical source. Simultaneously a document of sex cultures and of the edges of morality, and a historically and culturally situated speculation on what bodies and sex may become, porn offers both cultural critics and historians a rich archive for deepening their knowledge of the intersections of culture, morality, pleasure, community, embodiment, and the politics of belonging.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipArts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationIssue 142, pp. 133 - 141en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1215/01636545-9397115
dc.identifier.grantnumberAH/S00193X/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/125272
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherDuke University Pressen_GB
dc.rights© 2021 Duke University Press. All Rights Reserved.
dc.titleSexing the Archive: Gay Porn and Subcultural Historiesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-03-31T09:26:56Z
dc.identifier.issn0163-6545
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Duke University Press via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionNOTE: this author accepted manuscript has a slightly different title from the final published version
dc.identifier.journalRadical History Reviewen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-01-08
exeter.funder::Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC)en_GB
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-01-08
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-03-31T08:43:45Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2022-02-02T16:25:51Z
refterms.panelDen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record