Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMüller, C
dc.contributor.authorFranke, J
dc.contributor.authorJägermeyr, J
dc.contributor.authorRuane, AC
dc.contributor.authorElliott, J
dc.contributor.authorMoyer, E
dc.contributor.authorHeinke, J
dc.contributor.authorFalloon, PD
dc.contributor.authorFolberth, C
dc.contributor.authorFrancois, L
dc.contributor.authorHank, T
dc.contributor.authorIzaurralde, RC
dc.contributor.authorJacquemin, I
dc.contributor.authorLiu, W
dc.contributor.authorOlin, S
dc.contributor.authorPugh, TAM
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, K
dc.contributor.authorZabel, F
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-01T12:10:05Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-26
dc.description.abstractConcerns over climate change are motivated in large part because of their impact on human society. Assessing the effect of that uncertainty on specific potential impacts is demanding, since it requires a systematic survey over both climate and impacts models. We provide a comprehensive evaluation of uncertainty in projected crop yields for maize, spring and winter wheat, rice, and soybean, using a suite of nine crop models and up to 45 CMIP5 and 34 CMIP6 climate projections for three different forcing scenarios. To make this task computationally tractable, we use a new set of statistical crop model emulators. We find that climate and crop models contribute about equally to overall uncertainty. While the ranges of yield uncertainties under CMIP5 and CMIP6 projections are similar, median impact in aggregate total caloric production is typically more negative for the CMIP6 projections (+1% to −19%) than for CMIP5 (+5% to −13%). In the first half of the 21st century and for individual crops is the spread across crop models typically wider than that across climate models, but we find distinct differences between crops: globally, wheat and maize uncertainties are dominated by the crop models, but soybean and rice are more sensitive to the climate projections. Climate models with very similar global mean warming can lead to very different aggregate impacts so that climate model uncertainties remain a significant contributor to agricultural impacts uncertainty. These results show the utility of large-ensemble methods that allow comprehensively evaluating factors affecting crop yields or other impacts under climate change. The crop model ensemble used here is unbalanced and pulls the assumption that all projections are equally plausible into question. Better methods for consistent model testing, also at the level of individual processes, will have to be developed and applied by the crop modeling community.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (NSF)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen Philanthropy Projecten_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNASAen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNewton Funden_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 16 (3), article 034040en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1748-9326/abd8fc
dc.identifier.grantnumberDGE-1735359en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberDGE-1746045en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberSES-1463644en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/125282
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherIOP Publishingen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4321276en_GB
dc.rights© 2021 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd. Open access. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.en_GB
dc.subjectagricultureen_GB
dc.subjectcrop modelingen_GB
dc.subjectcrop modellingen_GB
dc.subjectclimate changeen_GB
dc.subjectuncertaintyen_GB
dc.subjectAgMIPen_GB
dc.subjectCMIPen_GB
dc.titleExploring uncertainties in global crop yield projections in a large ensemble of crop models and CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate scenariosen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-04-01T12:10:05Z
dc.identifier.issn1748-9318
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from IOP Publishing via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability statement: The data that support the findings of this study are openly available at the following URL/DOI: (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4321276).en_GB
dc.identifier.journalEnvironmental Research Lettersen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-01-06
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-02-26
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-04-01T12:04:16Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2021-04-01T12:10:16Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2021 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd. Open access. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2021 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd. Open access. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.