Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTownsend, KG
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-12T07:47:30Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-12
dc.description.abstractChildren ought to have a right to genital integrity whatever their sociocultural background, sex trait category, or assigned gender. I defend this statement by developing an account of the child as rights-bearer, who I define as a distinct embodied human entity who is profoundly dependent and vulnerable to physical harm, and is becoming autonomous. Children, I argue, are owed at least the same moral consideration as their adult counterparts, but require different treatment because of their uniquely dependent status. The care they require ought to protect them from unnecessary external disruptions to their conditions for becoming autonomous - where becoming autonomous is a necessary precondition for exercising autonomy in adulthood. This commitment need not restrict all parental value-sharing, which is impossible and undesirable, but it should limit parental value-sharing if the shared value requires violating the child’s genital integrity and upsetting their conditions for sexual autonomy for non-medical reasons. If children were physically independent, or assumed to be autonomous rather than becoming autonomous, then the argument against non-medical non-autonomous genital cutting could easily be pitched with reference to the right to bodily integrity. But adults regularly do things to children that they would not do to other adults, because of their physical dependence, and because of their presumed status as pre-, or non-, or becoming autonomous. Any right to bodily integrity they have, then, is conditional on it serving other interests or needs, and routinely violated. The practical conditionality of the child’s right to bodily integrity is the first reason for a need for a distinct right to genital integrity. The second reason is a normative prioritisation of the value of sexual autonomy for all individuals - where the child’s right to genital integrity is an external precondition for the development and exercise of sexual autonomy.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/125329
dc.publisherUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonThis thesis is embargoed until the 31/May/2027 as the thesis contains politically sensitive material and arguments. The author also intends to publish large parts of the thesis as a book or in articles.en_GB
dc.subjectthe child's right to bodily integrityen_GB
dc.subjectthe child's right to genital integrityen_GB
dc.subjectbodily autonomyen_GB
dc.subjectgenital autonomyen_GB
dc.subjectchild genital cuttingen_GB
dc.subjectfemale genital cuttingen_GB
dc.subjectmale genital cuttingen_GB
dc.subjectintersex genital modificationen_GB
dc.subjecttrans teen bodily modificationen_GB
dc.subjectchildren's rightsen_GB
dc.subjectcultural rightsen_GB
dc.subjectsexual autonomyen_GB
dc.subjectsocio-cultural normsen_GB
dc.subjectunthinking heteronormativityen_GB
dc.subjectscribbling on our children's autonomyen_GB
dc.titleThe child's right to genital integrity: protecting the child, rejecting harmful practices, and enabling sexual autonomyen_GB
dc.typeThesis or dissertationen_GB
dc.date.available2021-04-12T07:47:30Z
dc.contributor.advisorLamb, Ren_GB
dc.contributor.advisorSchaap, Aen_GB
dc.contributor.advisorLucas, Sen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentPoliticsen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dc.type.degreetitlePhD in Political Philosophyen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctoral Thesisen_GB
rioxxterms.versionNAen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-04-12
rioxxterms.typeThesisen_GB
refterms.dateFOA2021-04-12T07:47:30Z


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record