A realist evaluation of a collaborative model to support research co-production in long-term care settings in England: the ExCHANGE protocol
dc.contributor.author | Wilkinson, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Day, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Thompson-Coon, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Goodwin, V | |
dc.contributor.author | Liabo, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Coxon, G | |
dc.contributor.author | Cox, G | |
dc.contributor.author | Marriott, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Lang, IA | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-21T07:25:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-03-20 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Collaborative working between academic institutions and those who provide health and social care has been identified as integral in order to produce acceptable, relevant, and timely research, and for outputs to be useful and practical to implement. The ExCHANGE Collaboration aims to bring together researchers and people working, living in and visiting care homes to build capacity, share and mobilise knowledge, and identify key areas for future research. This paper describes an embedded, formative, realist and theory-driven evaluation which aims to gather information about how successful the ExCHANGE Collaboration is perceived to be in achieving its aims. An existing realist programme theory from the literature – Closer Collaboration – will be supplemented by two substantive theories: Co-production and Knowledge Brokering. This will result in an initial programme theory which will be tested by this formative evaluation to refine understanding of how the ExCHANGE Collaboration works. Methods: The evaluation will employ mixed qualitative methods, including: analysis of documents such as feedback forms, Knowledge Broker journal/diary, event attendance records, risk and issues logs and other relevant paperwork gathered as part of project delivery; observations of events/activities; and interviews with care home providers and staff, care home residents, residents’ family members, and researchers who are involved in the project (both project design/delivery, and also attendance or involvement in project activities/events). Framework Analysis will be used to interpret the data collected; analysis will be strategic, by focusing on particular key areas of importance in the developing theory of how the ExCHANGE Collaboration might achieve change. Results: The results of this study are expected to be published in 2022. Discussion: This evaluation will investigate how successful the ExCHANGE Collaboration is perceived to be in achieving its aims, in what way, in which contexts, and how this may differ for those involved. It will do this by testing an initial programme theory about how the collaboration works, for whom, under which circumstances, and in what way. Findings will be shared through written publication, an end of project learning event for those involved/interested in the project, and a lay summary to be made publically available. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Alzheimer's Society | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Dunhill Medical Trust | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 7, article 18 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s40900-021-00257-2 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/125406 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | BMC | en_GB |
dc.rights | © The Author(s). 2021Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you giveappropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate ifchanges were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commonslicence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commonslicence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtainpermission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to thedata made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. | en_GB |
dc.subject | Knowledge brokering | en_GB |
dc.subject | Knowledge mobilisation | en_GB |
dc.subject | Implementation | en_GB |
dc.subject | Collaboration | en_GB |
dc.subject | Care homes | en_GB |
dc.subject | Evidence-informed practice | en_GB |
dc.subject | Realist evaluation | en_GB |
dc.subject | Wellbeing | en_GB |
dc.title | A realist evaluation of a collaborative model to support research co-production in long-term care settings in England: the ExCHANGE protocol | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2021-04-21T07:25:49Z | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available from BMC via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Research Involvement and Engagement | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2021-02-22 | |
exeter.funder | ::Alzheimer's Society | en_GB |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2021-02-22 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2021-04-21T07:19:22Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-04-21T07:26:40Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s). 2021Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you giveappropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate ifchanges were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commonslicence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commonslicence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtainpermission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to thedata made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.