To develop a progressive multimetric configuration optimisation method for WRF simulations of extreme rainfall events over Egypt
dc.contributor.author | Liu, Y | |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Y | |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, O | |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhuo, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Rico-Ramirez, MA | |
dc.contributor.author | Han, D | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-26T14:53:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-03-23 | |
dc.description.abstract | The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model can help to improve our understanding of analysing and forecasting hydrometeorological disasters. Especially for some regions like the Nile Delta, which faces growing climate hazards but has inadequate in situ rainfall observations. However, identifying an optimal configuration to run the WRF model is often a challenge. In this study, the WRF model was used to simulate extreme rainfall events at high spatial and temporal resolutions centered around Alexandria, in northern Egypt. In particular, a progressive multimetric configuration optimisation (PMCO) method is proposed to identify the possible optimal configurations of WRF in the aspect of domain size, numbers of vertical levels, nesting ratio, spin-up times, and physical parameterization schemes (microphysics, planetary boundary layer, and cumulus), based on 48 specifically designed experiments. The simulation performances are quantified and sorted by the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). All WRF simulations use the ERA5 reanalysis dataset as boundary conditions and the WRF results are verified against the Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG). The results show that the rainfall distribution and magnitude are most sensitive to the spin-up time and physical parameterization schemes. It is also observed that the improvement of WRF's reproducibility of rainfall intensity is usually accompanied by a decrease in the reproducibility of rainfall distribution. The best model configuration for the study area comprises of three-level nesting (D01 80x80; D02 112x112; D03 88X88), 58 vertical levels, 1:3:3 downscaling ratio, 48h spin-up time, WRF Single-Moment 6-class microphysics scheme, Mellor-Yamada-Janjic planetary boundary layer scheme, and Grell-Freitas cumulus. The stability of this configuration is also verified with the other three extreme rainfall events over Egypt. The results show that there exists a common WRF configuration set in Egypt that produces the relatively good simulations for extreme rainfall events. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | UK Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Egypt Science and Technology Development Fund (STDF) | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | China Scholarship Council | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | University of Bristol | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 598, article 126237 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126237 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 332430681 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 201908310086 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/125482 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Under embargo until 23 March 2022 in compliance with publisher policy | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2021 Elsevier B.V. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_GB |
dc.subject | WRF rainfall simulation | en_GB |
dc.subject | ERA5 | en_GB |
dc.subject | IMERG | en_GB |
dc.subject | PMCO method | en_GB |
dc.subject | Egypt | en_GB |
dc.title | To develop a progressive multimetric configuration optimisation method for WRF simulations of extreme rainfall events over Egypt | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2021-04-26T14:53:40Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0022-1694 | |
exeter.article-number | 126237 | en_GB |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Journal of Hydrology | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2021-03-18 | |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2021-03-23 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2021-04-26T14:47:17Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2022-03-23T00:00:00Z | |
refterms.panel | B | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2021 Elsevier B.V. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/