Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPryce, D
dc.contributor.authorMemon, FA
dc.contributor.authorKapelan, Z
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-24T14:39:32Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-10
dc.description.abstractWith the aim of reducing the environmental burden of decentralized wastewater treatment plants in India, this project investigated five primary materials (stainless steel (SS), mild steel (MS), glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP), high density polyethylene (HDPE), and reinforced concrete cement (RCC)) in terms of the relative environmental impact that each would incur across 13 midpoint and 4 endpoint impact categories during the early life stages. The results showed that SS demonstrated substantially higher impact in total (5.47 Pt) and across each of the endpoint categories, most notably human health (3.12 Pt). Further investigations demonstrated that this was largely fed by the respiratory inorganics midpoint category that accounted for 50 % of the total impact (2.75 Pt), while global warming (0.93 Pt), non-renewable energy (0.70 Pt) and terrestrial ecotoxicity (0.62 Pt) were the only other considerable impacts. GFRP incurred the second greatest impact overall (2.32 Pt), while MS, RCC and HDPE followed with 1.82 Pt, 0.78 Pt, and 0.39 Pt respectively. HDPE afforded the greatest efficiency in all midpoint categories except carcinogens where RCC incurred the least environmental cost. Results were then compared with previous work and likely causal factors highlighted. Further study is recommended to investigate the longevity of the alternative materials in a wastewater containment role to support these results.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEliquo Hydrok Ltden_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 4, article 100065en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.envadv.2021.100065
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/125793
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights©2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).en_GB
dc.subjectLCAen_GB
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_GB
dc.subjectSewage treatment planten_GB
dc.titleLife cycle analysis approach to comparing environmental impacts of alternative materials used in the construction of small wastewater treatment plantsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-05-24T14:39:32Z
dc.identifier.issn2666-7657
exeter.article-number100065en_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.identifier.journalEnvironmental Advancesen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-04-30
exeter.funder::Eliquo Hydrok Ltden_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-04-30
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-05-24T14:33:18Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2021-05-24T14:39:55Z
refterms.panelBen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

©2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as ©2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).