Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOkada, K
dc.contributor.authorKatsuki, M
dc.contributor.authorSharma, MD
dc.contributor.authorKiyose, K
dc.contributor.authorSeko, T
dc.contributor.authorOkada, Y
dc.contributor.authorWilson, AJ
dc.contributor.authorHosken, DJ
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-10T14:48:48Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-08
dc.description.abstractTheory shows how sexual selection can exaggerate male traits beyond naturally selected optima and also how natural selection can ultimately halt trait elaboration. Empirical evidence supports this theory, but to our knowledge, there have been no experimental evolution studies directly testing this logic, and little examination of possible associated effects on female fitness. Here we use experimental evolution of replicate populations of broad-horned flour beetles to test for effects of sex-specific predation on an exaggerated sexually selected male trait (the mandibles), while also testing for effects on female lifetime reproductive success. We find that populations subjected to male-specific predation evolve smaller sexually selected mandibles and this indirectly increases female fitness, seemingly through intersexual genetic correlations we document. Predation solely on females has no effects. Our findings support fundamental theory, but also reveal unforseen outcomes—the indirect effect on females—when natural selection targets sex-limited sexually selected characters.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipLeverhulme Trusten_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipJapan Society for the Promotion of Scienceen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 12, article 3420en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41467-021-23804-7
dc.identifier.grantnumberRF-2015-001en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber18K0641700en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber18H0481en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber19H04913en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber21H02540en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber19J40100en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/126010
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherNature Researchen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2021. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_GB
dc.titleNatural selection increases female fitness by reversing the exaggeration of a male sexually selected traiten_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-06-10T14:48:48Z
exeter.article-number3420en_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Nature Research via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability: The data that support the findings of this study are provided in Supplementary Data 1. This includes population mean trait values during and on completion of experimental evolution, fighting data, predation-mandible size data and the pedigree data. Source data are provided with this paper.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2041-1723
dc.identifier.journalNature Communicationsen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-05-17
exeter.funder::Leverhulme Trusten_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-05-08
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-06-10T14:45:40Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2021-06-10T14:49:03Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2021. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.