Artificial nighttime lighting impacts visual ecology links between flowers, pollinators and predators
dc.contributor.author | Briolat, ES | |
dc.contributor.author | Gaston, KJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Bennie, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Rosenfeld, EJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Troscianko, J | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T13:10:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-07-06 | |
dc.description.abstract | The nighttime environment is being altered rapidly over large areas worldwide through introduction of artificial lighting, from streetlights and other sources. This is predicted to impact the visual ecology of many organisms, affecting both their intra- and interspecific interactions. Here, we show the effects of different artificial light sources on multiple aspects of hawkmoth visual ecology, including their perception of floral signals for pollination, the potential for intraspecific sexual signalling, and the effectiveness of their visual defences against avian predators. Light sources fall into three broad categories: some that prevent use of chromatic signals for these behaviours, others that more closely mimic natural lighting conditions, and, finally, types whose effects vary with light intensity and signal colour. We find that Phosphor Converted (PC) amber LED lighting – often suggested to be less harmful to nocturnal insects – falls into this third disruptive group, with unpredictable consequences for insect visual ecology depending on distance from the light source and the colour of the objects viewed. The diversity of impacts of artificial lighting on hawkmoth visual ecology alone argues for a nuanced approach to outdoor lighting in environmentally sensitive areas, employing intensities and spectra designed to limit those effects of most significant concern. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 12, article 4163 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/s41467-021-24394-0 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/126091 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Nature Research | en_GB |
dc.rights | © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.title | Artificial nighttime lighting impacts visual ecology links between flowers, pollinators and predators | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-17T13:10:49Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2041-1723 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from Nature Research via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.description | Data availability: The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study, including source data for figures 2 & 3, are available within the paper's supplementary information files. | en_GB |
dc.description | Code availability: Full analysis code is available as a supplementary information file. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Nature Communications | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2021-06-15 | |
exeter.funder | ::Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) | en_GB |
exeter.funder | ::Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) | en_GB |
rioxxterms.funder | Natural Environment Research Council | en_GB |
rioxxterms.funder | Natural Environment Research Council | en_GB |
rioxxterms.identifier.project | NE/P018084/1 | en_GB |
rioxxterms.identifier.project | NE/P01156X/1 | en_GB |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2021-06-15 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2021-06-17T09:35:32Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-07-08T08:41:08Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
rioxxterms.funder.project | 60429c87-985a-48d7-989b-b09b00ee7bae | en_GB |
rioxxterms.funder.project | 0b38abb2-b33e-4ec5-8865-9120327a2554 | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/