Waiting as probation: selecting self-disciplining asylum seekers
dc.contributor.author | Vianelli, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Gill, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Hoellerer, N | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T13:26:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-08-04 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article diagnoses and critiques a type of governmentality associated with waiting during protracted asylum appeal procedures by drawing upon data from a multi-methodological study of asylum adjudication in Europe. Focusing on Austria, Germany and Italy, we explore the use of integration-related considerations in asylum appeal processes by looking at the ways in which these considerations permeate judges’ decision-making, particularly, but not exclusively, on the granting of national, non-EU harmonised protection statuses. Building on insights from the literature on conditional integration we question the implicit socio-political biases and moral assumptions that underpin this permeation. We show that the use of integration-related considerations in asylum appeals transforms migrant waiting into a period of probation during which rejected asylum seekers’ conducts are governed and tested in relation to the use of time. More than simply waiting patiently, rejected asylum seekers are expected to wait productively, whereby productivity is assessed through the neoliberal imperatives of entrepreneurship, autonomy and self-improvement. We thus contribute to scholarship on migrant waiting by moving beyond an emphasis on the contradictory character of waiting, as both imposition and potentiality, and showing how time is capitalised by state authorities even when – and actually because – it offers opportunities for migrants. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 4 August 2021 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/1369183X.2021.1926942 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/126092 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Taylor and Francis / CEMES / Sussex Centre for Migration Research at the University of Sussex | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | en_GB |
dc.subject | governmentality | en_GB |
dc.subject | waiting | en_GB |
dc.subject | asylum adjudication | en_GB |
dc.subject | integration | en_GB |
dc.subject | humanitarian protection | en_GB |
dc.subject | asylum seekers | en_GB |
dc.title | Waiting as probation: selecting self-disciplining asylum seekers | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-17T13:26:09Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0047-9586 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from Taylor and Francis via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.description | Data Availability Statement: There are no datasets available for this paper. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2021-05-04 | |
exeter.funder | ::European Commission | en_GB |
rioxxterms.funder | European Research Council | en_GB |
rioxxterms.identifier.project | StG2015_677917 | en_GB |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2021-05-04 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2021-06-17T11:55:25Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-08-04T15:27:40Z | |
refterms.panel | C | en_GB |
rioxxterms.funder.project | e962bdf8-1810-40b8-9b75-3298c212e711 | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.