Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVan den Brink, PJ
dc.contributor.authorAlix, A
dc.contributor.authorThorbek, P
dc.contributor.authorBaveco, H
dc.contributor.authorAgatz, A
dc.contributor.authorFaber, JH
dc.contributor.authorBrown, AR
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, S
dc.contributor.authorMaltby, L
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-30T08:30:43Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-29
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this case study was to explore the feasibility of using ecological models for applying an ecosystem services-based approach to environmental risk assessment using currently available data and methodologies. For this we used a 5 step approach: 1) selection of environmental scenario, 2) ecosystem service selection, 3) development of logic chains, 4) selection and application of ecological models and 5) detailed ecosystem service assessment. The study system is a European apple orchard managed according to integrated pest management principles. An organophosphate insecticide was used as the case study chemical. Four ecosystem services are included in this case study: soil quality regulation, pest control, pollination and recreation. Logic chains were developed for each ecosystem service and describe the link between toxicant effects on service providing units and ecosystem services delivery. For the soil quality regulation ecosystem service, springtails and earthworms were the service providing units, for the pest control ecosystem service it was ladybirds, for the pollination ecosystem service it was honeybees and for the recreation ecosystem service it was the meadow brown butterfly. All the ecological models addressed the spatio-temporal magnitude of the direct effects of the insecticide on the service providing units and ecological production functions were used to extrapolate these outcomes to the delivery of ecosystem services. For all ecosystem services a decision on the acceptability of the modelled and extrapolated effects on the service providing units could be made using the protection goals as set by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Developing quantitative ecological production functions for extrapolation of ecosystem services delivery from population endpoints remains one of the major challenges. We feel that the use of ecological models can greatly add to this development, although the further development of existing ecological models, and of new models, is needed for this.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Chemical Industry Councilen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 798, article 149329en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149329
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/126607
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).  en_GB
dc.subjectPesticidesen_GB
dc.subjectEcosystem servicesen_GB
dc.subjectRisk assessmenten_GB
dc.subjectTerrestrial environmenten_GB
dc.titleThe use of ecological models to assess the effects of a plant protection product on ecosystem services provided by an orcharden_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-07-30T08:30:43Z
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697
exeter.article-number149329en_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this record en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1879-1026
dc.identifier.journalScience of The Total Environmenten_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-07-24
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-07-29
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-07-30T08:23:41Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2021-07-30T08:30:51Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
 
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).