Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLloyd, J
dc.contributor.authorBjornstad, G
dc.contributor.authorBorek, A
dc.contributor.authorCuffe-Fuller, B
dc.contributor.authorFredlund, M
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, A
dc.contributor.authorTarrant, M
dc.contributor.authorBerry, V
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, K
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, S
dc.contributor.authorGillett, A
dc.contributor.authorLogan, S
dc.contributor.authorMorris, C
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-31T07:29:35Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-25
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: Parent carers of children with special educational needs or disability are at risk of poorer mental and physical health. In response to these needs, we codeveloped the 'Healthy Parent Carers' (HPC) programme. This study examined the views and experiences of participants in the HPC feasibility trial to inform programme refinement. INTERVENTION, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: HPC is a peer-led group-based intervention (supported by online materials) for primary carers of disabled children, encouraging behaviours linked with health and well-being. It was delivered by two lead and six assistant peer facilitators in six community sites (one lead and one assistant per group) in South West England over six or 12 sessions. Control participants had online materials only. The trial involved 47 intervention and 45 control parent carers (97% female and 97% white) and eight facilitators (one male). DESIGN: A preplanned mixed methods process evaluation using questionnaires and checklists (during and after the intervention), qualitative interviews with participants after intervention (n=18) and a focus group with facilitators after trial. RESULTS: HPC was highly acceptable to participants and facilitators and experiences were very positive. Participants reported that the programme increased awareness of what parent carers could and could not change and their self-efficacy to engage in health-promoting behaviours. The intended mechanisms of action (social identification and peer support) matched participants' expectations and experiences. Control participants found the online-only programme flexible but isolating, as there were no opportunities to share ideas and problem solve with peers, the key function of the programme. Areas for improvement were identified for programme content, facilitator training and delivery. CONCLUSION: HPC was acceptable, well received and offers considerable potential to improve the health of parent carers. Under the pandemic, the challenge going forward is how best to maintain reach and fidelity to function while delivering a more virtual programme. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN151144652.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 11, article e045570en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045570
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/126928
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34433591en_GB
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_GB
dc.subjectpreventive medicineen_GB
dc.subjectqualitative researchen_GB
dc.subjectstatistics & research methodsen_GB
dc.titleHealthy Parent Carers programme: mixed methods process evaluation and refinement of a health promotion interventionen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-08-31T07:29:35Z
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from the BMJ Publishing Group via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability statement; Data are available upon reasonable request.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2044-6055
dc.identifier.journalBMJ Openen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-08-09
exeter.funder::National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-08-25
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-08-31T07:28:06Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2021-08-31T07:31:53Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. 
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.