Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBogaard, A
dc.contributor.authorAllaby, R
dc.contributor.authorArbuckle, BS
dc.contributor.authorBendrey, R
dc.contributor.authorCrowley, S
dc.contributor.authorCucchi, T
dc.contributor.authorDenham, T
dc.contributor.authorFrantz, L
dc.contributor.authorFuller, D
dc.contributor.authorGilbert, T
dc.contributor.authorKarlsson, E
dc.contributor.authorManin, A
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, F
dc.contributor.authorMueller, N
dc.contributor.authorPeters, J
dc.contributor.authorStépanoff, C
dc.contributor.authorWeide, A
dc.contributor.authorLarson, G
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-31T12:24:56Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-25
dc.description.abstractProcess philosophy offers a metaphysical foundation for domestication studies. This grounding is especially important given the European colonialist origin of ‘domestication’ as a term and 19th century cultural project. We explore the potential of process archaeology for deep-time investigation of domestication relationships, drawing attention to the variable pace of domestication as an ongoing process within and across taxa; the nature of domestication ‘syndromes’ and ‘pathways’ as general hypotheses about process; the importance of cooperation as well as competition among humans and other organisms; the significance of non-human agency; and the ubiquity of hybrid communities that resist the simple wild/domestic dichotomy.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Research Council (ERC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 25 August 2021en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00438243.2021.1954990
dc.identifier.grantnumberERC-2013-StG-337574-UNDEADen_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber165831460en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/126939
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_GB
dc.rights© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.en_GB
dc.subjectdomesticationen_GB
dc.subjectprocessen_GB
dc.subjectagricultureen_GB
dc.subjectherdingen_GB
dc.subjectnicheen_GB
dc.subjecthybridityen_GB
dc.titleReconsidering domestication from a process archaeology perspectiveen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-08-31T12:24:56Z
dc.identifier.issn0043-8243
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Routledge via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalWorld Archaeologyen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-08-25
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-08-31T12:22:32Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2021-08-31T12:25:05Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.