Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHooper, B
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-21T07:47:55Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-20
dc.description.abstractCognitive abilities vary widely across the animal kingdom, and multiple hypotheses have been formulated to explain why. The Relationship Intelligence Hypothesis (RIH) posits that maintaining and managing high quality pair-bonds is a key driver of cognitive evolution. The RIH was first proposed more than a decade ago, and while its introductory paper has been widely cited, little work has been done to interrogate the RIH’s central predictions. In this thesis, I critically evaluate the RIH. First, in Chapters 2 – 4, I test central predictions of the RIH within one wild study system, the jackdaw (Corvus monedula). Specifically, I test whether (i) pairs have fully aligned fitness interests (Chapter 2); (ii) pairs use consolation as a mechanism through which to manage and maintain their bond (Chapter 3); (iii) pair-bond strength (1) varies between pairs, (2) is consistent within pairs, (3) positively correlates with socio-cognitive performance, and (4) positively correlates with reproductive success (Chapter 4). Finally, I test whether a commonly used method in the study of cognitive evolution - the comparative study of brain size – is methodologically robust (Chapter 5). I find that jackdaw partners do not always have fully aligned fitness interests, and that they do not use consolation to manage and maintain their pair-bond. However, pair-bond strength does vary between pairs, is consistent within pairs and is positively correlated with a measure of socio-cognitive performance, partner responsiveness. While I did not find a link between pair-bond strength and reproductive success, partners with stronger bonds were better able to adjust hatching synchrony to environmental conditions. Finally, I demonstrate that comparative studies of brain size are not methodologically robust. In Chapter 6, I integrate my findings with contemporary empirical and theoretical evidence in order to critically evaluate the RIH. I end by proposing future directions for the study of cognitive evolution.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNERC
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/127152
dc.publisherUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonChapters to be publisheden_GB
dc.subjectCognitionen_GB
dc.subjectSocialityen_GB
dc.subjectPair-bondsen_GB
dc.subjectCorviden_GB
dc.subjectCognitive evolutionen_GB
dc.subjectSocial evolutionen_GB
dc.titleA Critical Evaluation of the Relationship Intelligence Hypothesisen_GB
dc.typeThesis or dissertationen_GB
dc.date.available2021-09-21T07:47:55Z
dc.contributor.advisorThornton, Aen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentBiological Sciencesen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dc.type.degreetitlePhD in Biological Sciencesen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctoral Thesisen_GB
rioxxterms.versionNAen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-09-14
rioxxterms.typeThesisen_GB
refterms.dateFOA2021-09-21T07:48:11Z


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record