Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKoutsoumanis, K
dc.contributor.authorAllende, A
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez-Ordóñez, A
dc.contributor.authorBolton, D
dc.contributor.authorBover-Cid, S
dc.contributor.authorChemaly, M
dc.contributor.authorDavies, R
dc.contributor.authorDe Cesare, A
dc.contributor.authorHerman, L
dc.contributor.authorHilbert, F
dc.contributor.authorLindqvist, R
dc.contributor.authorNauta, M
dc.contributor.authorRu, G
dc.contributor.authorSimmons, M
dc.contributor.authorSkandamis, P
dc.contributor.authorSuffredini, E
dc.contributor.authorArgüello, H
dc.contributor.authorBerendonk, T
dc.contributor.authorCavaco, LM
dc.contributor.authorGaze, W
dc.contributor.authorSchmitt, H
dc.contributor.authorTopp, E
dc.contributor.authorGuerra, B
dc.contributor.authorLiébana, E
dc.contributor.authorStella, P
dc.contributor.authorPeixe, L
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-29T14:41:59Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-17
dc.description.abstractThe role of food-producing environments in the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in EU plant-based food production, terrestrial animals (poultry, cattle and pigs) and aquaculture was assessed. Among the various sources and transmission routes identified, fertilisers of faecal origin, irrigation and surface water for plant-based food and water for aquaculture were considered of major importance. For terrestrial animal production, potential sources consist of feed, humans, water, air/dust, soil, wildlife, rodents, arthropods and equipment. Among those, evidence was found for introduction with feed and humans, for the other sources, the importance could not be assessed. Several ARB of highest priority for public health, such as carbapenem or extended-spectrum cephalosporin and/or fluoroquinolone-resistant Enterobacterales (including Salmonella enterica), fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter spp., methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and glycopeptide-resistant Enterococcus faecium and E. faecalis were identified. Among highest priority ARGs blaCTX-M, blaVIM, blaNDM, blaOXA-48-like, blaOXA-23, mcr, armA, vanA, cfr and optrA were reported. These highest priority bacteria and genes were identified in different sources, at primary and post-harvest level, particularly faeces/manure, soil and water. For all sectors, reducing the occurrence of faecal microbial contamination of fertilisers, water, feed and the production environment and minimising persistence/recycling of ARB within animal production facilities is a priority. Proper implementation of good hygiene practices, biosecurity and food safety management systems is very important. Potential AMR-specific interventions are in the early stages of development. Many data gaps relating to sources and relevance of transmission routes, diversity of ARB and ARGs, effectiveness of mitigation measures were identified. Representative epidemiological and attribution studies on AMR and its effective control in food production environments at EU level, linked to One Health and environmental initiatives, are urgently required.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 19, No. 6, article 06651en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6651
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/127638
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.rights© 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.en_GB
dc.subjectantimicrobial resistanceen_GB
dc.subjectfood-producing environmenten_GB
dc.subjectantimicrobial resistance genesen_GB
dc.subjectantimicrobial-resistant bacteriaen_GB
dc.subjectanimalsen_GB
dc.subjectplantsen_GB
dc.subjectaquacultureen_GB
dc.subjectenvironmenten_GB
dc.subjectfooden_GB
dc.titleRole played by the environment in the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) through the food chainen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-10-29T14:41:59Z
dc.identifier.issn1831-4732
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from Wiley via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.identifier.journalEFSA Journalen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-04-29
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-06-17
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-10-29T14:38:47Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2021-10-29T14:42:08Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.