Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMeaden, S
dc.contributor.authorBiswas, A
dc.contributor.authorArkhipova, K
dc.contributor.authorMorales, SE
dc.contributor.authorDutilh, BE
dc.contributor.authorWestra, ER
dc.contributor.authorFineran, PC
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-16T15:04:22Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-09
dc.date.updated2021-11-16T14:42:05Z
dc.description.abstractCRISPR-Cas are adaptive immune systems that protect their hosts against viruses and other parasitic mobile genetic elements.1 Although widely distributed among prokaryotic taxa, CRISPR-Cas systems are not ubiquitous.2-4 Like most defense-system genes, CRISPR-Cas are frequently lost and gained, suggesting advantages are specific to particular environmental conditions.5 Selection from viruses is assumed to drive the acquisition and maintenance of these immune systems in nature, and both theory6-8 and experiments have identified phage density and diversity as key fitness determinants.9,10 However, these approaches lack the biological complexity inherent in nature. Here, we exploit metagenomic data from 324 samples across diverse ecosystems to analyze CRISPR abundance in natural environments. For each metagenome, we quantified viral abundance and diversity to test whether these contribute to CRISPR-Cas abundance across ecosystems. We find a strong positive association between CRISPR-Cas abundance and viral abundance. In addition, when controlling for differences in viral abundance, CRISPR-Cas systems are more abundant when viral diversity is low, suggesting that such adaptive immune systems may offer limited protection when required to target a diverse viral community. CRISPR-Cas abundance also differed among environments, with environmental classification explaining roughly a quarter of the variation in CRISPR-Cas relative abundance. The relationships between CRISPR-Cas abundance, viral abundance, and viral diversity are broadly consistent across environments, providing robust evidence from natural ecosystems that supports predictions of when CRISPR is beneficial. These results indicate that viral abundance and diversity are major ecological factors that drive the selection and maintenance of CRISPR-Cas in microbial ecosystems.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Union Horizon 2020en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNetherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Research Council (ERC)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 9 November 2021en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.10.038
dc.identifier.grantnumberERC-STG-2016-714478en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/M018350/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber842656en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber864.14.004en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber865694en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/127827
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-4396-0354 (Westra, Edze R)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34758284en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://github.com/s-meaden/Meaden_CB_2021en_GB
dc.rights© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)en_GB
dc.subjectCRISPR-Casen_GB
dc.subjectbacteriophagesen_GB
dc.subjectmetagenomicsen_GB
dc.subjectmicrobial ecologyen_GB
dc.titleHigh viral abundance and low diversity are associated with increased CRISPR-Cas prevalence across microbial ecosystemsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-11-16T15:04:22Z
dc.identifier.issn0960-9822
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData and code availability: DNA sequence data are publicly available from the SRA database. Accession numbers are listed in Data S1F. No new sequence data was generated for this study. Original code is deposited in the github repositories listed in the Key resources table and statistical analysis scripts are available at https://github.com/s-meaden/Meaden_CB_2021. Code is publicly available at the time of publication. Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1879-0445
dc.identifier.journalCurrent Biologyen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofCurr Biol
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-10-19
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-11-09
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-11-16T14:58:01Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-16T15:04:25Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)