Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHollands, L
dc.contributor.authorCalitri, R
dc.contributor.authorWarmoth, K
dc.contributor.authorShepherd, A
dc.contributor.authorAllison, R
dc.contributor.authorDean, S
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-16T15:22:29Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-12
dc.date.updated2021-11-16T14:51:00Z
dc.description.abstractPurpose Hemiparesis and physical deconditioning following stroke lead to an increase in falls, which many individuals cannot get up from. Teaching stroke survivors to independently get off the floor (IGO) might mitigate long-lie complications. IGO was taught as part of a community-based, functional rehabilitation training programme (ReTrain). We explore the feasibility of teaching IGO and assess participant’s level of mastery, adherence, and injury risk. Materials and methods Videos of participants (n = 17) performing IGO at early, middle, and late stages of the ReTrain programme were compared to a manualised standard. A visual, qualitative analysis was used to assess technique mastery, adherence, and injury risk. Results Most participants (64%) achieved independent, safe practice of IGO. A good (73%) level of adherence to IGO and low incidence of risk of injury (6.8%) were observed. Deviations were made to accommodate for non-stroke related comorbidities. Conclusions IGO was successfully and safely practised by stroke survivors including those with hemiparesis. Trainers should be aware of comorbidities that may impede completion of IGO and modify teaching to accommodate individual need. Further research should assess if IGO can be utilised by individuals who have other disabilities with unilateral impairments and whether IGO has physical, functional and economic benefit. Implications for rehabilitation Falls are common in stroke survivors, and many are unable to get up despite being uninjured, leading to long-lie complications or ambulance call-outs but non-conveyance to hospital. Teaching the independently getting up off the floor (IGO) technique to stroke survivors was possible for those with or without hemiparesis, and remained safe despite modifications to accommodate an individual’s needs. Individual assessment is needed to check if a stroke survivor is suitable for learning IGO including, but not limited to, their ability to safely get to the floor and to temporarily stand (without support) at the end of the technique.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipStroke Associationen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipARC East of Englanden_GB
dc.format.extent1-10
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 12 November 2021en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1998672
dc.identifier.grantnumberTSA-2014-03en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/127829
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-6451-6255 (Hollands, Laura)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-0889-4670 (Calitri, Raff)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-3682-5149 (Dean, Sarah)
dc.identifierScopusID: 12804309300 | 56654882600 | 56844769700 | 57192416272 | 8583848900 (Dean, Sarah)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_GB
dc.rights© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_GB
dc.subjectfallsen_GB
dc.subjectphysical rehabilitationen_GB
dc.subjecthemiparesisen_GB
dc.subjectadherenceen_GB
dc.subjectstrokeen_GB
dc.titleAssessing the fidelity of the independently getting up off the floor (IGO) technique as part of the ReTrain pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial for stroke survivorsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-11-16T15:22:29Z
dc.identifier.issn0963-8288
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Taylor & Francis via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability statement: Participants did not consent for datasets to be stored or accessed outside of the research team. Therefore, no datasets have been made publicly available.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1464-5165
dc.identifier.journalDisability and Rehabilitationen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofDisability and Rehabilitation
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-10-16
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-11-12
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-11-16T15:20:30Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-16T15:22:34Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2021-11-12


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.