Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArathimos, R
dc.contributor.authorFabbri, C
dc.contributor.authorVassos, E
dc.contributor.authorDavis, KAS
dc.contributor.authorPain, O
dc.contributor.authorGillett, A
dc.contributor.authorColeman, JRI
dc.contributor.authorHanscombe, K
dc.contributor.authorHagenaars, S
dc.contributor.authorJermy, B
dc.contributor.authorCorbett, A
dc.contributor.authorBallard, C
dc.contributor.authorAarsland, D
dc.contributor.authorCreese, B
dc.contributor.authorLewis, CM
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-17T16:11:59Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-04
dc.date.updated2021-11-17T15:37:07Z
dc.description.abstractBackground Mood disorders are characterised by pronounced symptom heterogeneity, which presents a substantial challenge both to clinical practice and research. Identification of subgroups of individuals with homogeneous symptom profiles that cut across current diagnostic categories could provide insights in to the transdiagnostic relevance of individual symptoms, which current categorical diagnostic systems cannot impart. Aims To identify groups of people with homogeneous clinical characteristics using symptoms of manic and/or irritable mood and explore differences between groups in diagnoses, functional outcomes and genetic liability. Methods We used latent class analysis (LCA) on eight binary self-reported symptoms of manic and irritable mood in UK Biobank and PROTECT studies to investigate how individuals formed latent subgroups. We tested associations between the latent classes and diagnoses of psychiatric disorders, sociodemographic characteristics, and polygenic risk scores (PRS). Results Five latent classes were derived in UK Biobank (N=42,183) and were replicated in the independent PROTECT cohort (N=4,445), including ‘minimally affected’, ‘inactive restless’, active restless’, ‘focused creative’, and ‘extensively affected’ individuals. These classes differed in disorder risk, PRS, and functional outcomes. One class that experienced disruptive episodes of mostly irritable mood was largely comprised of cases of depression/anxiety, and a class of individuals with increased confidence/creativity reported comparatively lower disruptiveness and functional impairment. Conclusion Findings suggest that data-driven investigations of psychopathological symptoms that include sub56 diagnostic threshold conditions, can complement research of clinical diagnoses. Improved classification systems of psychopathology could investigate a weighted approach to symptoms, towards a more dimensional classification of mood disorders.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipMedical Research Council (MRC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipFondazione Umberto Veronesien_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 4 January 2022en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1192/bjp.2021.184
dc.identifier.grantnumberMC_PC_17189en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberMR/S0151132en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/127857
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-6490-6037 (Creese, Byron)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCambridge University Press / Royal College of Psychiatristsen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.titleLatent subtypes of manic and/or irritable episode symptoms in two population-based cohortsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-11-17T16:11:59Z
dc.identifier.issn0007-1250
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Cambridge University Press via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1472-1465
dc.identifier.journalBritish Journal of Psychiatryen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Psychiatry
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-11-16
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-11-16
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-11-17T15:37:24Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.