Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKhan, T
dc.contributor.authorEl-Sockary, Y
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, WT
dc.contributor.authorShephard, EA
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-15T15:28:38Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-06
dc.date.updated2021-12-15T14:15:15Z
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Cancers of the nasopharynx, nasal cavity, and accessory sinuses ("sinonasal") are rare in England, with around 750 patients diagnosed annually. There are no specific National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) referral guidelines for these cancers and no primary care research published. OBJECTIVE: To identify and quantify clinical features of sinonasal cancer in UK primary care patients. METHODS: This matched case-control study used UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) data. Patients were aged ≥40 years with a diagnosis of sinonasal cancer between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2009 and had consulted their GP in the year before diagnosis. Clinical features of sinonasal cancer were analysed using conditional logistic regression. Positive predictive values (PPVs) for single and combined features were calculated. RESULTS: In total, 155 cases and 697 controls were studied. Nine symptoms and one abnormal investigation were significantly associated with the cancer: nasal mass; odds ratio, 95 (95% confidence interval 7.0, 1315, P = 0.001); head and neck lumps, 68 (12, 387, P < 0.001); epistaxis, 17 (3.9, 70, P < 0.001); rhinorrhoea, 14 (4.6, 44, P < 0.001); visual disturbance, 12 (2.2, 67, P = 0.004); sinusitis, 7.3 (2.2, 25, P = 0.001); sore throat, 6.0 (2.0, 18, P = 0.001); otalgia, 5.4 (1.6, 18, P = 0.007); headache, 3.6 (1.4, 9.5, P = 0.01); raised white cell count, 8.5 (2.8, 27, P < 0.001). Combined PPVs for epistaxis/rhinorrhoea, epistaxis/sinusitis, and rhinorrhoea/sinusitis were 0.62%. CONCLUSION: This is the first primary care study identifying epistaxis, sinusitis, and rhinorrhoea as part of the clinical prodrome of sinonasal cancer. Although no PPVs meet the 3% NICE referral threshold, these results may help clinicians identify who warrants safety-netting and possible specialist referral, potentially reducing the number of advanced-stage diagnoses of sinonasal cancer.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Researchen_GB
dc.format.extentcmab153--
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 6 December 2021en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmab153
dc.identifier.grantnumberRP-PG-0608-10045en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/128133
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-3610-3680 (Shephard, Elizabeth A)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34871409en_GB
dc.subjectdiagnosisen_GB
dc.subjectearly detection of canceren_GB
dc.subjectgeneral practiceen_GB
dc.subjectnasopharynxen_GB
dc.subjectparanasal sinusesen_GB
dc.subjectprimary health careen_GB
dc.titleRecognizing sinonasal cancer in primary care: a matched case-control study using electronic records.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-12-15T15:28:38Z
dc.identifier.issn0263-2136
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from Oxford University Press via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1460-2229
dc.identifier.journalFamily Practiceen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofFam Pract
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-12-06
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-12-15T15:20:43Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2021-12-15T15:29:03Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record