Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPang, L
dc.contributor.authorColclough, KC
dc.contributor.authorShepherd, MH
dc.contributor.authorMcLean, J
dc.contributor.authorPearson, ER
dc.contributor.authorEllard, S
dc.contributor.authorHattersley, AT
dc.contributor.authorShields, BM
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-11T09:49:36Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-21
dc.date.updated2022-01-11T08:33:36Z
dc.description.abstractAims/hypothesis: Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) is a rare monogenic form of diabetes. In 2009, >80% of UK cases were estimated to be misdiagnosed. Since then, there have been a number of initiatives to improve the awareness and detection of MODY including education initiatives (Genetic Diabetes Nurse (GDN) programme), the MODY probability calculator, and targeted next generation sequencing (tNGS). We aimed to examine how the estimated prevalence of MODY, and other forms of monogenic diabetes diagnosed outside the neonatal period, has changed over time and how the initiatives have impacted case finding. Research design and Methods: UK referrals for genetic testing for monogenic diabetes diagnosed >1y of age from 01/01/1996 to 31/12/2019 were examined. Positive-test rates were compared for referrals reporting involvement of the GDNs/MODY calculator with those that did not. Results: A diagnosis of monogenic diabetes was confirmed in 3860 individuals, >3-fold higher than 2009 (01/01/1996-28/02/2009; n=1177). Median age at diagnosis in probands was 21y. GDN involvement was reported in 21% of referrals; these referrals had a higher positive-test rate than those without GDN involvement (32% v 23%, p<0.001). MODY calculator usage was indicated on 74% of eligible referrals since 2014; these referrals had a higher positive-test rate than those not using the calculator (33% v 25%, p=0.001). 410 (10.6%) cases were identified through tNGS. Monogenic diabetes prevalence was estimated to be 248 cases/million (double that estimated in 2009 due to increased case-finding). 3 Conclusions: Since 2009, referral rates and case diagnosis have increased three-fold. This is likely to be the consequence of tNGS, GDN education and the MODY calculator.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 21 January 2022en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.2337/dc21-2056
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/128351
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-3785-327X (Shields, Beverley)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherAmerican Diabetes Associationen_GB
dc.rights© 2022 by the American Diabetes Association
dc.subjectdiabetesen_GB
dc.subjectGDNen_GB
dc.subjectmisdiagnoseden_GB
dc.subjectMODYen_GB
dc.subjectmonogenicen_GB
dc.subjectprevalenceen_GB
dc.titleImprovements in awareness and testing have led to a threefold increase over 10 years in the identification of monogenic diabetes in the U.K.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-01-11T09:49:36Z
dc.identifier.issn1935-5548
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the American Diabetes Association via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalDiabetes Careen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofDiabetes Care
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-12-23
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-12-23
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-01-11T09:47:42Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2022-01-25T10:43:05Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record