Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWalker, LA
dc.contributor.authorLawrence, NS
dc.contributor.authorChambers, CD
dc.contributor.authorWood, M
dc.contributor.authorBarnett, J
dc.contributor.authorDurrant, H
dc.contributor.authorPike, L
dc.contributor.authorO'Grady, G
dc.contributor.authorBestmann, S
dc.contributor.authorKythreotis, AP
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-17T14:40:47Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-26
dc.date.updated2022-01-17T14:15:32Z
dc.description.abstractAccess to reliable and timely information ensures that decision-makers can operate effectively. The motivations and challenges of parliamentarians and policy-makers in accessing evidence have been well documented in the policy literature. However, there has been little focus on research-providers. Understanding both the demand- and the supply-side of research engagement is imperative to enhancing impactful interactions. Here, we examine the broader experiences, motivations and challenges of UK-based research professionals engaging with research-users relevant to policy-making and scrutiny in the UK using a nationwide online questionnaire. The context of the survey partly involved contributing to the UK Evidence Information Service (EIS), a proposed rapid match-making service to facilitate interaction between parliamentary arenas that use evidence and research-providers. Our findings reveal, at least for this sub-sample who responded, that there are gender-related differences in policy-related experience, motivations, incentives and challenges for research professionals to contribute to evidence-informed decision-making through initiatives such as the EIS. Male and female participants were equally likely to have policy experience; however, males reported both significantly broader engagement with the research-users included in the survey and significantly higher levels of engagement with each research-user. Reported incentives for engagement included understanding what the evidence will be used for, guidance on style and content of contribution, and acknowledgement of contributions by the policymaker or elected official. Female participants were significantly more likely to select the guidance-related options. The main reported barrier was workload. We discuss how academia-policy engagement initiatives can best address these issues in ways that enhance the integration of research evidence with policy and practice across the UK.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipGW4 Building Communitiesen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Research Council (ERC)en_GB
dc.format.extente0214136-
dc.identifier.citationVol. 14 (3), article e0214136en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214136
dc.identifier.grantnumberGW4-AF5-004en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber647893en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/128437
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-1969-6637 (Lawrence, Natalia S)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30913236en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://osf.io/z4xt2/en_GB
dc.rights© 2019 Walker et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_GB
dc.subjectBiomedical Researchen_GB
dc.subjectDecision Makingen_GB
dc.subjectFemaleen_GB
dc.subjectHumansen_GB
dc.subjectMaleen_GB
dc.subjectPolicy Makingen_GB
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnairesen_GB
dc.subjectUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.titleSupporting evidence-informed policy and scrutiny: A consultation of UK research professionalsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-01-17T14:40:47Z
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
exeter.article-numberARTN e0214136
exeter.place-of-publicationUnited States
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from the Public Library of Science via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData Availability: All files are available at https://osf.io/z4xt2/en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203
dc.identifier.journalPLoS Oneen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS One, 14(3)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-03-07
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-03-26
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-01-17T14:39:07Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2022-01-17T14:40:56Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2019-03-26


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2019 Walker et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2019 Walker et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.