Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHardy, V
dc.contributor.authorYue, A
dc.contributor.authorArcher, S
dc.contributor.authorMerriel, SWD
dc.contributor.authorThompson, M
dc.contributor.authorEmery, J
dc.contributor.authorUsher-Smith, J
dc.contributor.authorWalter, FM
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-26T11:53:38Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-24
dc.date.updated2022-01-26T11:18:31Z
dc.description.abstractBackground Missed opportunities for diagnosing cancer cause patients harm and have been attributed to suboptimal use of tests and referral pathways in primary care. Primary care physician (PCP) factors have been suggested to affect decisions to investigate cancer, but their influence is poorly understood. Objective To synthesise evidence evaluating the influence of PCP factors on decisions to investigate symptoms of possible cancer. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL and PsycINFO between January 1990 and March 2021 for relevant citations. Studies examining the effect or perceptions and experiences of PCP factors on use of tests and referrals for symptomatic patients with any cancer were included. PCP factors comprised personal characteristics and attributes of physicians in clinical practice. Data extraction and synthesis Critical appraisal and data extraction were undertaken independently by two authors. Due to study heterogeneity, data could not be statistically pooled. We, therefore, performed a narrative synthesis. Results 29 studies were included. Most studies were conducted in European countries. A total of 11 PCP factors were identified comprising modifiable and non-modifiable factors. Clinical judgement of symptoms as suspicious or 'alarm' prompted more investigations than non-alarm symptoms. ‘Gut feeling’ predicted a subsequent cancer diagnosis and was perceived to facilitate decisions to investigate non-specific symptoms as PCP experience increased. Female PCPs investigated cancer more than male PCPs. The effect of PCP age and years of experience on testing and referral decisions was inconclusive. Conclusions PCP interpretation of symptoms as higher risk facilitated testing and referral decisions for possible cancer. However, in the absence of 'alarm' symptoms or ‘gut feeling’, PCPs may not investigate cancer. PCPs require strategies for identifying patients with non-alarm and non-specific symptoms who need testing or referral. PROSPERO registration number CRD420191560515.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipCancer Research UKen_GB
dc.format.extente053732-e053732
dc.identifier.citationVol. 12, article e053732en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053732
dc.identifier.grantnumberC8640/A23385en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberC12292/A20861en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/128571
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-2919-9087 (Merriel, Samuel William David)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_GB
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.en_GB
dc.titleRole of primary care physician factors on diagnostic testing and referral decisions for symptoms of possible cancer: a systematic reviewen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-01-26T11:53:38Z
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from BMJ Publishing Group via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability statement: All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information. All research data supporting this publication are provided within this article.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2044-6055
dc.identifier.journalBMJ Openen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Open, 12(1)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-12-23
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-01-24
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-01-26T11:46:43Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2022-01-26T11:53:44Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2022-01-24


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

©  Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.