Correction to 'Bayesian inference reveals positive but subtle effects of experimental fishery closures on marine predator demographics'
dc.contributor.author | Sherley, RB | |
dc.contributor.author | Barham, BJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Barham, PJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Campbell, KJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Crawford, RJM | |
dc.contributor.author | Grigg, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Horswill, C | |
dc.contributor.author | McInnes, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Morris, TL | |
dc.contributor.author | Pichegru, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Steinfurth, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Weller, F | |
dc.contributor.author | Winker, H | |
dc.contributor.author | Votier, SC | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-31T09:58:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-11-17 | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-01-30T19:09:27Z | |
dc.description.abstract | It has recently come to our attention that we made a coding error while implementing the hierarchical mixed-models describing chick condition and chick survival (equations (2.1) and (2.2), respectively) in ‘Bayesian inference reveals positive but subtle effects of experimental fishery closures on marine predator demographics' [1]. This error meant that the nested random effect described in equation (2.1) and the hierarchical shared frailty term described in equation (2.2) were not implemented correctly in the original analysis. This resulted in our reporting the model parameter estimates with higher precision than should have been the case (table 1 and figure 1). Here we present corrected results (table 1 and figure 1) based on correctly specified models in JAGS [2] applied to the datasets used in our original analysis. Our error, which pertained to the specification of the structure of the priors for the nested random effects (see electronic supplementary material), influenced the derived parameter estimates of the mean chick condition or chick survival during closed and open years (figure 1) more (standard deviations are between 29% and 285% larger in the corrected results) than the estimates for the regression coefficients representing the island effect (–0.8 to 9%), closure effect (4–8%) or their interaction (6–8%). These changes do not alter the predicted influence of the fisheries closures on the population dynamics of endangered African penguins Spheniscus demersus. | en_GB |
dc.format.extent | 20212129- | |
dc.format.medium | Print-Electronic | |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 288(1963), article ARTN 20212129 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.2129 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/128655 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0001-7367-9315 (Sherley, Richard B) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Royal Society | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34784771 | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/32505 | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://datadryad.org/stash/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.d4977 | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2021 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. This version is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dc.title | Correction to 'Bayesian inference reveals positive but subtle effects of experimental fishery closures on marine predator demographics' | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-31T09:58:32Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0962-8452 | |
exeter.article-number | ARTN 20212129 | |
exeter.place-of-publication | England | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the Royal Society via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.description | The article to which this is the correction is available in ORE at http://hdl.handle.net/10871/32505 | en_GB |
dc.description | Data accessibility. The data used in both this correction and the original analyses are available from the Dryad Digital Repository: https://datadryad.org/stash/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.d4977 [7]. The corrected code is provided in electronic supplementary material S2. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1471-2954 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartof | Proc Biol Sci, 288(1963) | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2021 | |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2021-11-17 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2022-01-31T09:55:38Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2022-01-31T09:58:46Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2021-11-17 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by the Royal Society. This version is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/