Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKuepfer, A
dc.contributor.authorSherley, RB
dc.contributor.authorBrickle, P
dc.contributor.authorArkhipkin, A
dc.contributor.authorVotier, SC
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-01T09:08:13Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-29
dc.date.updated2022-01-31T16:37:21Z
dc.description.abstractIncidental mortality in trawl fisheries is a serious threat to seabird sustainability. Driven primarily by seabirds attracted to discards, limiting discard discharge through strategic batching is a best practice mitigation measure recommended by the Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels (ACAP). However, studies supporting the efficacy of batch discarding are rare, limited to the south-western Pacific, and assess seabird numbers attending vessels only, not gear contact rates. The effectiveness of batch discarding in areas with different seabird communities, fishery assemblages, and natural prey availability is therefore unknown. Here we quantify both seabird numbers and gear contact rates in response to strategic discard discharge in the Falkland Islands trawl fleet for two high-risk species groups: black-browed albatross (Thalassarche melanophris) and giant petrel species (Macronectes spp.). Specifically, we test the effect of three different discharge treatments (zero, batch and continuous discarding) at two vessels. Bird abundance and contact rates were positively related, but zero discarding consistently reduced seabird numbers attending trawlers and eliminated contacts with warp cables and tori-lines. Batching significantly reduced bird abundance and contact rates at the vessel that stored all discards between batches. At the other vessel, however, intermittent release of hashed viscera diminished the mitigation effect. Our findings validate the generality of batch discarding as an effective mitigation measure in trawl fisheries where zero discarding is not possible, whilst highlighting the importance of complete waste storage.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipFortuna Ltd.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipFalkland Islands Governmenten_GB
dc.format.extent109462-109462
dc.identifier.citationVol. 266, article 109462en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109462
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/128667
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-7367-9315 (Sherley, Richard B)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 29 January 2023 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  en_GB
dc.subjectSeabird bycatchen_GB
dc.subjectDiscard managementen_GB
dc.subjectSouthwest Atlanticen_GB
dc.subjectTrawl fisheriesen_GB
dc.subjectProcellariiformesen_GB
dc.titleStrategic discarding reduces seabird numbers and contact rates with trawl fishery gears in the Southwest Atlanticen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-02-01T09:08:13Z
dc.identifier.issn0006-3207
exeter.article-number109462
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalBiological Conservationen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofBiological Conservation, 266
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-01-08
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-01-29
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-02-01T09:05:03Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 Elsevier Ltd.  This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/