Self-Efficacy in Intercultural English Language Use, Intercultural Communicative Competence, and Frequent Intercultural Encounters through Study Abroad? An Examination of Omani Arab Students' Intercultural Perceptions and Lived Experiences Abroad
Al-Abri, A
Date: 7 March 2022
Publisher
University of Exeter
Degree Title
Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Education
Abstract
This explanatory quasi-experimental sequential mixed-methods research examined the impact of study abroad in the UK, the US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand on Omani students’ Intercultural Communicative Competence (ICC), Self-Efficacy in Intercultural English Language Use (SEIELU), and Intercultural Interaction Frequency (IIF). ...
This explanatory quasi-experimental sequential mixed-methods research examined the impact of study abroad in the UK, the US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand on Omani students’ Intercultural Communicative Competence (ICC), Self-Efficacy in Intercultural English Language Use (SEIELU), and Intercultural Interaction Frequency (IIF). Meaningful intercultural engagements were considered the key to further development of the intercultural competencies under study (Meier & Daniels, 2013; Schartner & Young, 2020), approached through a newly developed model, Developmental Model of Intercultural Communicative Competence (DMICC), and subsequently new measurement scales used as pre- and post-tests: a 58-item multidimensional ICC scale, a 14-item unidimensional SEIELU scale and a 3-item IIF scale. The quantitative (foundation) inquiry was followed up by a qualitative inquiry through the use of semi-structured interviews and a survey open-ended question for an in-depth exploration of the key quantitative findings.
The quantitative study sample included a total of 343 Omani study-abroad and stay-in-Oman students, aged 17-52 years, and the qualitative sample included 11 semi-structured interview participants (10 UK & 1 New Zealand-based) and 15 UK-based open-ended question respondents.
Contrary to previous research (Al-Makhmari & Amzat, 2012) and prevailing belief, the quantitative inquiry revealed that the one-year abroad, no matter the country of stay, gender, type of stay abroad (alone or with one’s own Omani family), and with previous intercultural experiences or not, did not yield any significant changes in the respondents’ ICC, SEIELU, and IIF levels. The educational level and multilingualism also did not seem to play any considerable roles in this regard. A period of more than six years of stay abroad was a requirement for the participants to experience an advancement in these respective aspects.
Both the quantitative and qualitative findings showed that the participants had limited frequency, depth, and breadth in interactions with the host locals due, according to the qualitative findings, to cultural, linguistic, personality-related and cognitive reasons as most frequently expressed causes, as well as educational, family, communication skills-related, and emotional reasons. The qualitative results also showed that the experience was also more triggered by instrumental and less self-determined goals.
Consequently, the participants’ intercultural learning from study abroad was more limited to knowledge of the host culture’s tangible elements, education system, and correction of some stereotypes. English learning was also more restricted to the acquisition of vocabulary, language expressions, grammar, word pronunciation, understanding locals’ English accents, accented English, and reading and writing skill development. Speaking was the least practised language skill. Enjoyment of being abroad and with other Omani and Arab students, travelling, and feelings of independence and self-reliance were their other benefits of studying abroad. Academically, they could develop research competence and field knowledge. Despite the limited learning benefits, students evaluated study abroad highly.
Higher levels of SEIELU were found achievable through deeper intercultural interactions whose fulfilment was attainable through the development of ICC, primarily through the enhancement of more positive attitudes towards cultural differences in the first place, and knowledge and awareness of the host culture than the mere frequency of intercultural interactions, negative intercultural emotion control, and critical thinking and communication skills.
Doctoral Theses
Doctoral College
Item views 0
Full item downloads 0
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Assessing Orientations to Cultural Difference of the Faculty of a University Foundation Programme in the Gulf Cooperation Council: A Mixed-Methods Approach Informed by the Intercultural Development Continuum and Using the Intercultural Development Inventory
McKay, Ian Ross (University of Exeter Graduate School of Education, 23 May 2013)This study examined the orientations to cultural difference of sojourner educators in the Foundation Program at Qatar University to determine if orientations were correlated with select demographic and experiential variables, ... -
Implementing the Rabat Commitment: The Development of Intercultural Communicative Competence (ICC) as a Pedagogical Framework in a Chinese Educational Context.
Tong, Z (University of Exeter Graduate School of Education, 21 September 2020)Globalization has led to an increasingly interconnected and integrated world on a scale unparalleled in human history. The convergence of cultures and civilizations within this ever-shrinking world is contrasted with the ... -
Learning to Live interculturally: an exploration of experience and learning among a group of international students at a university in the UK
Rich, Sarah Alice Louise (University of Exeter College of Social Sciences and International Studies, 6 June 2011)n the past 30 years there has been a rapid and exponential growth in the numbers of people electing to complete all or part of their studies outside of their country of origin. This phenomenon has attracted considerable ...