Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDede, M
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T14:20:13Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-14
dc.date.updated2022-03-21T11:22:43Z
dc.description.abstractIn this thesis I discuss how existing inequlity and discrimination has shaped the discourse on biomedical enhancement and how the bioenhancement project can potentially exasperate them. In chapter one I discuss the most common objections against bioenhancement which include issues pertaining to cheating, praisworthyness, altering the nature of activities, coercion, quick fixes, distributive justice and authenticity. I then turn to ask why bioenhancement is desirable. I argue that bioenhancement proponents uphold a narrow understanding of autonomy, namely as control and increased choices which becomes a criterion for a good life. As such, cognitive capacities are desirable to the extent that they increase autonomy and wellbeing. In chapter two I continue this thread to argue that bioenhancement advocates understand disability as inherently bad to the extent that it is incompatible with autonomy as they envision it. To assess this claim I discuss different models of disability and argue in favor of a model of disability as neutral simpliciter. In the final chapter I discuss the issue of moral status as it is a key way in which the bioenhancement literature envisions future challenges in terms of equality. I explore the similarities in how moral status is discussed within animal ethics and within the bioenhancement literature. I explore how disability and animality are constructed as problems that biomedical enhancement can address and I conclude that biomedical enhancement is inherently incompatible to disability justice.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/129109
dc.publisherUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.subjectenhancement, disability, moral status, animal ethicsen_GB
dc.titleInequality and Discrimination in Biomedical Enhancementen_GB
dc.typeThesis or dissertationen_GB
dc.date.available2022-03-21T14:20:13Z
dc.contributor.advisorLamb, Robert
dc.contributor.advisorGlackin, Shane
dc.publisher.departmentSociology, Philosophy and Anthropology
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dc.type.degreetitleDoctor of Philosophy in Philosophy
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoral
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctoral Thesis
rioxxterms.versionNAen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-03-14
rioxxterms.typeThesisen_GB
refterms.dateFOA2022-03-21T14:20:34Z


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record