Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLiao, C
dc.contributor.authorChen, Y
dc.contributor.authorWang, J
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Y
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Y
dc.contributor.authorLin, Z
dc.contributor.authorLu, X
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Y
dc.contributor.authorTao, F
dc.contributor.authorLombardozzi, D
dc.contributor.authorArneth, A
dc.contributor.authorGoll, DS
dc.contributor.authorJain, A
dc.contributor.authorSitch, S
dc.contributor.authorLin, Y
dc.contributor.authorXue, W
dc.contributor.authorHuang, X
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Y
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-12T09:24:44Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-08
dc.date.updated2022-04-12T07:59:37Z
dc.description.abstractBackground: Large uncertainty in modeling land carbon (C) uptake heavily impedes the accurate prediction of the global C budget. Identifying the uncertainty sources among models is crucial for model improvement yet has been difficult due to multiple feedbacks within Earth System Models (ESMs). Here we present a Matrix-based Ensemble Model Inter-comparison Platform (MEMIP) under a unified model traceability framework to evaluate multiple soil organic carbon (SOC) models. Using the MEMIP, we analyzed how the vertically resolved soil biogeochemistry structure influences SOC prediction in two soil organic matter (SOM) models. By comparing the model outputs from the C-only and CN modes, the SOC differences contributed by individual processes and N feedback between vegetation and soil were explicitly disentangled. Results: Results showed that the multi-layer models with a vertically resolved structure predicted significantly higher SOC than the single layer models over the historical simulation (1900–2000). The SOC difference between the multi-layer models was remarkably higher than between the single-layer models. Traceability analysis indicated that over 80% of the SOC increase in the multi-layer models was contributed by the incorporation of depth-related processes, while SOC differences were similarly contributed by the processes and N feedback between models with the same soil depth representation. Conclusions: The output suggested that feedback is a non-negligible contributor to the inter-model difference of SOC prediction, especially between models with similar process representation. Further analysis with TRENDY v7 and more extensive MEMIP outputs illustrated the potential important role of multi-layer structure to enlarge the current ensemble spread and the necessity of more detail model decomposition to fully disentangle inter-model differences. We stressed the importance of analyzing ensemble outputs from the fundamental model structures, and holding a holistic view in understanding the ensemble uncertainty.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Key Research and Development Program of Chinaen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Youth Science Fund of Chinaen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Center for Atmospheric Researchen_GB
dc.format.extent14-
dc.identifier.citationVol. 11(1), article 14en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-021-00356-8
dc.identifier.grantnumber2017YFA0604600en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber41701227en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/129353
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-1821-8561 (Sitch, Stephen)
dc.identifierScopusID: 6603113016 (Sitch, Stephen)
dc.identifierResearcherID: F-8034-2015 (Sitch, Stephen)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringeren_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2022. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_GB
dc.subjectSoil organic carbonen_GB
dc.subjectInter-model comparisonen_GB
dc.subjectUncertainty analysisen_GB
dc.subjectCarbon-nitrogen couplingen_GB
dc.subjectVertical resolved soil biogeochemistry structureen_GB
dc.titleDisentangling land model uncertainty via Matrix-based Ensemble Model Inter-comparison Platform (MEMIP)en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-04-12T09:24:44Z
dc.identifier.issn2192-1709
exeter.article-number14
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Springer via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionAvailability of data and materials; The MEMIP data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. The TRENDY v7 data are available from the TRENDY project coordinators upon reasonable request.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2192-1709
dc.identifier.journalEcological Processesen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofEcological Processes, 11(1)
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-12-28
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-02-08
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-04-12T09:20:09Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2022-04-12T09:24:49Z
refterms.panelCen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2022-02-08


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2022. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2022. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.