The Development and internal evaluation of a predictive model to identify for whom mindfulness-based cognitive therapy offers superior relapse prevention for recurrent depression versus maintenance antidepressant medication
dc.contributor.author | Cohen, ZD | |
dc.contributor.author | DeRubeis, RJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Hayes, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Watkins, ER | |
dc.contributor.author | Lewis, G | |
dc.contributor.author | Byng, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Byford, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Crane, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Kuyken, W | |
dc.contributor.author | Dalgleish, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Schweizer, S | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-13T12:19:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-04-29 | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-05-13T11:39:13Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Depression is highly recurrent, even following successful pharmacological and/or psychological intervention. We aimed to develop clinical prediction models to inform adults with recurrent depression choosing between antidepressant medication (ADM) maintenance or switching to mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT). Using previously published data (N = 424), we constructed prognostic models using elastic-net regression that combined demographic, clinical, and psychological factors to predict relapse at 24 months under ADM or MBCT. Only the ADM model (discrimination performance: area under the curve [AUC] = .68) predicted relapse better than baseline depression severity (AUC = .54; one-tailed DeLong’s test: z = 2.8, p = .003). Individuals with the poorest ADM prognoses who switched to MBCT had better outcomes compared with individuals who maintained ADM (48% vs. 70% relapse, respectively; superior survival times, z = −2.7, p = .008). For individuals with moderate to good ADM prognoses, both treatments resulted in similar likelihood of relapse. If replicated, the results suggest that predictive modeling can inform clinical decision-making around relapse prevention in recurrent depression. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | National Institute for Health Research | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Medical Research Council | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Wellcome Trust | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | MQ Foundation | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Wellcome Trust | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Wellcome Trust | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | National Institute for Health Research | en_GB |
dc.format.extent | 216770262210768- | |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 29 April 2022 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026221076832 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 08/56/01 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | SUAG/043 G101400 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 209127/ Z/17/Z | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | MQ14PM_27 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 104908/Z/14/Z | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 107496/Z/15/Z | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/129607 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0001-7525-322X (Hayes, Rachel) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | SAGE Publications / Association for Psychological Science | en_GB |
dc.rights | © The Author(s) 2022. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). | en_GB |
dc.subject | antidepressant medication | en_GB |
dc.subject | depression | en_GB |
dc.subject | mindfulness-based cognitive therapy | en_GB |
dc.subject | precision medicine | en_GB |
dc.subject | relapse prevention | en_GB |
dc.title | The Development and internal evaluation of a predictive model to identify for whom mindfulness-based cognitive therapy offers superior relapse prevention for recurrent depression versus maintenance antidepressant medication | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2022-05-13T12:19:09Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2167-7026 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available from SAGE Publications via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2167-7034 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Clinical Psychological Science | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical Psychological Science | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2022-01-11 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2022-04-29 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2022-05-13T12:06:32Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2022-05-13T12:19:15Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2022-04-29 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2022. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).