Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMargiotta-Casaluci, L
dc.contributor.authorOwen, SF
dc.contributor.authorRand-Weaver, M
dc.contributor.authorWinter, MJ
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-25T08:11:03Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-19
dc.date.updated2022-05-24T15:04:33Z
dc.description.abstractThe zebrafish is rapidly emerging as a promising alternative in vivo model for the detection of drug-induced cardiovascular effects. Despite its increasing popularity, the ability of this model to inform the drug development process is often limited by the uncertainties around the quantitative relevance of zebrafish responses compared with nonclinical mammalian species and ultimately humans. In this test of concept study, we provide a comparative quantitative analysis of the in vivo cardiovascular responses of zebrafish, rat, dog, and human to three model compounds (propranolol, losartan, and captopril), which act as modulators of two key systems (beta-adrenergic and renin-angiotensin systems) involved in the regulation of cardiovascular functions. We used in vivo imaging techniques to generate novel experimental data of drug-mediated cardiovascular effects in zebrafish larvae. These data were combined with a database of interspecies mammalian responses (i.e., heart rate, blood flow, vessel diameter, and stroke volume) extracted from the literature to perform a meta-analysis of effect size and direction across multiple species. In spite of the high heterogeneity of study design parameters, our analysis highlighted that zebrafish and human responses were largely comparable in >80% of drug/endpoint combinations. However, it also revealed a high intraspecies variability, which, in some cases, prevented a conclusive interpretation of the drug-induced effect. Despite the shortcomings of our study, the meta-analysis approach, combined with a suitable data visualization strategy, enabled us to observe patterns of response that would likely remain undetected with more traditional methods of qualitative comparative analysis. We propose that expanding this approach to larger datasets encompassing multiple drugs and modes of action would enable a rigorous and systematic assessment of the applicability domain of the zebrafish from both a mechanistic and phenotypic standpoint. This will increase the confidence in its application for the early detection of adverse drug reactions in any major organ system.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Councilen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipAstraZenecaen_GB
dc.format.extent893-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-eCollection
dc.identifier.citationVol. 10, article 893en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00893
dc.identifier.grantnumberBB/100646X/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/129718
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-1196-0483 (Winter, Matthew J)
dc.identifierScopusID: 7202444342 (Winter, Matthew J)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31474857en_GB
dc.rightsCopyright © 2019 Margiotta-Casaluci, Owen, Rand-Weaver and Winter. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_GB
dc.subjectbeta-adrenergic receptoren_GB
dc.subjectcardiovascular effectsen_GB
dc.subjectcomparative pharmacologyen_GB
dc.subjectdrug safetyen_GB
dc.subjectmeta-analysisen_GB
dc.subjectpreclinical speciesen_GB
dc.subjectrenin–angiotensin systemen_GB
dc.subjectzebrafishen_GB
dc.titleTesting the translational power of the zebrafish: An interspecies analysis of responses to cardiovascular drugs.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-05-25T08:11:03Z
dc.identifier.issn1663-9812
exeter.place-of-publicationSwitzerland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from Frontiers Media via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.descriptionDATA AVAILABILITY: All datasets generated for this study are included in the manuscript and the supplementary files.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalFrontiers in Pharmacologyen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofFront Pharmacol, 10(JULY)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-07-16
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-08-19
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-05-25T08:07:55Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2022-05-25T08:11:09Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2019-08-19


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © 2019 Margiotta-Casaluci, Owen, Rand-Weaver and Winter. This
is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other
forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s)
are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in
accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction
is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Copyright © 2019 Margiotta-Casaluci, Owen, Rand-Weaver and Winter. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.