Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSaad, S
dc.contributor.authorJavadi, A
dc.contributor.authorChugh, T
dc.contributor.authorFarmani, R
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-17T10:07:06Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-11
dc.date.updated2022-06-16T15:27:23Z
dc.description.abstractMixed hydraulic barriers is an effective method to control seawater intrusion (SWI), particularly in regions that suffer from water shortages. However, determining the optimal well locations and rates for injection and abstraction is challenging due to the computational burden resulting from the huge number of calls for the high-fidelity hydrogeological simulation model. To alleviate this issue, we utilized a constrained multi-objective Bayesian optimization (BO) approach to optimize rates and locations of the hydraulic barriers to minimize total cost, aquifer salinity, and salt-wedge intrusion length, while satisfying regional abstractions with acceptable salinity levels. BO is useful for optimizing computationally expensive problems in few iterations by using a surrogate model and an acquisition function. Despite being an efficient optimization tool, the use of BO in the field of coastal aquifer management has not been explored. The proposed framework was evaluated on an unconfined aquifer subjected to three management scenarios considering different physical and technical constraints and was benchmarked against the widely used robust NSGA-II (Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II) method. The results proved the effectiveness of BO in achieving an optimum mixed hydraulic barriers design in much fewer runs of the variable density aquifer model. BO with 350 evaluations yielded comparable results to 4150 evaluations using NSGA-II. BO solutions were spatially well-distributed along the approximated Pareto front. For the same number of evaluations, the hypervolume obtained by BO was larger by 30%. Based on different scenarios, the average amount of water required for abstraction ranged from 1.5% to 25% of that for injection. The injection has a significant impact on SWI management, but the abstracted water provides an alternative source of water. A sensitivity analysis was conducted on the optimization problem to illustrate its efficiency by omitting the barriers one at a time and assessing impacts on objective and constraint functions.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipMinistry of Higher Education of the Arab Republic of Egypten_GB
dc.format.extent128021-
dc.identifier.citationVol. 612 (A), article 128021en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128021
dc.identifier.grantnumberNMM26/17en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/129967
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-8376-4652 (Javadi, Akbar)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-5123-8148 (Chugh, Tinkle)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/).en_GB
dc.subjectSeawater intrusionen_GB
dc.subjectCoastal aquifer managementen_GB
dc.subjectGaussian processesen_GB
dc.subjectSurrogate modelen_GB
dc.subjectHydraulic barriersen_GB
dc.subjectComputationally expensiveen_GB
dc.titleOptimal management of mixed hydraulic barriers in coastal aquifers using multi-objective Bayesian optimizationen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-06-17T10:07:06Z
dc.identifier.issn0022-1694
exeter.article-number128021
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Hydrologyen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Hydrology, 612
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-06-02
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-06-11
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-06-17T10:05:01Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2022-06-17T10:07:17Z
refterms.panelBen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/).