Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPerry, CT
dc.contributor.authorSalter, MA
dc.contributor.authorLange, ID
dc.contributor.authorKochan, DP
dc.contributor.authorHarborne, AR
dc.contributor.authorGraham, NAJ
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-29T09:05:07Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-04
dc.date.updated2022-06-29T07:59:15Z
dc.description.abstractCoral reef fishes perform essential and well-documented ecological functions on reefs, but also contribute important geo-ecological functions which influence reef carbonate cycling regimes. These functions include reef framework modification (through bioerosion and breakage), and the production, reworking and transport of reefal sediments. To explore how these functions vary across reefs and regions we compiled a dataset of available taxa-specific function rates and applied these to fish census data from sites in the Pacific Ocean (PO), Indian Ocean (IO) and Greater Caribbean (GC), each region displaying a gradient in fish biomass. Highest overall function rates occur at the highest fish biomass sites in the PO (Kingman Reef) and IO (Chagos Archipelago), where bioerosion dominates framework modification and sediment generation (up to 7 kg·m-2 ·yr-1 ). At the lowest biomass PO and IO sites, framework modification and sediment generation are driven mainly by breakage and occur at lower rates (~2 kg·m-2 ·yr-1 ). Sediment reworking rates are high across all PO and IO sites (~1 - 5 kg·m-2 ·yr-1 ) and higher than other function rates at low biomass sites. Geo37 ecological function rates are generally low across the GC sites, despite total fish biomass being comparable to, or even exceeding, some PO and IO sites, with sediment reworking (up to ~1 kg·m-2 ·yr-1 ) being the dominant function. These site-level differences partly reflect total fish biomass, but fish assemblage size structure and species identity is critical, with a few fish families (and species) underpinning the highest function rates and regulating the “health” of the fish-driven carbonate cycling regime. Reefs with high fish-driven framework modification, sediment production and reworking rates define one end of this spectrum, whilst at lower biomass sites little new sediment is produced and sediment reworking dominates. Whilst additional species level rate data are urgently needed to better constrain function rates, these transitions align with ideas about the progressive shut-down of carbonate production regimes on ecologically perturbed reefs, with important implications for reef building, shoreline sediment supply, and sediment carbon and nutrient cycling.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipLeverhulme Trusten_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBertarelli Foundationen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 13 (12), article e4288en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ecs2.4288
dc.identifier.grantnumberKTP010621en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/130087
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-9398-2418 (Perry, Chris)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWiley / Ecological Society of Americaen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.24378/exe.4043en_GB
dc.rights© 2022 The Authors. Ecosphere published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.subjectCoral reef fishen_GB
dc.subjectecological changeen_GB
dc.subjectcarbonate budgetsen_GB
dc.subjectsediment productionen_GB
dc.subjectsediment reworkingen_GB
dc.subjectsediment transporten_GB
dc.titleGeo-ecological functions provided by coral reef fishes vary among regions and impact reef carbonate cycling regimes (article)en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-06-29T09:05:07Z
dc.identifier.issn2150-8925
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability: Site level fish biomass and abundance data, data on the abundance and biomass of geo-ecologically relevant functional fish groups, as well as site level function rate data underpinning this paper are openly available from the University of Exeter's institutional repository at: https://doi.org/10.24378/exe.4043en_GB
dc.identifier.journalEcosphereen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofEcosphere
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-06-28
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-06-28
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-06-29T07:59:17Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2022-12-15T13:17:27Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 The Authors. Ecosphere published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 The Authors. Ecosphere published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.