Defining a visual metonym: A hauntological study of polar bear imagery in climate communication
dc.contributor.author | O'Neill, S | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-29T14:22:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-04-26 | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-06-29T08:34:24Z | |
dc.description.abstract | From television news bulletins, newspapers and magazines, documentaries and films, social media memes and cartooning, to protest and art – even to the images that spontaneously come into our minds – polar bears are now ubiquitously associated with climate change. Indeed, polar bear visuals now often mean nothing but climate change. Why do polar bear images, as a particular type of climate change imagery, continue to thrive and to circulate – and indeed, to haunt – our imaginings of climate change? This paper seeks to understand the tangled social, cultural, political, and scientific histories of polar bear visuals through defining a new concept, a ‘visual metonym’. This concept is worked through using a longitudinal analysis of visual evidence arising from political, social, scientific, and cultural domains and using a hauntological approach that is sensitive to the spectre-like nature of polar bear imagery. This reveals three periods in which the work that polar bear visuals has undertaken has changed: polar bear (1990s–mid-2000s), political bear (mid-2000s), and climate bear (mid-2000s onwards). By the time of the ‘climate bear’ period, polar bear images had become entrenched and irreducible from (i.e., they haunt) climate change. As polar bear images came to stand in for much wider debates – of climate scepticism and political (in)action – they became a visual metonym. The paper concludes by presenting the visual metonym concept as a way to explore and understand how particular image types gain power, agency, and meaning and how they come to act as signalling devices representing complex engagements with contemporary issues. The visual metonym concept can be used to understand, interrogate, and critique naturalised and pervasive issue-led imagery. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Leverhulme Trust | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 26 April 2022 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12543 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | RF-2021-599 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/130090 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0002-9062-6247 (O'Neill, Saffron) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Wiley / The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers) | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2022 The Author. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Geographical Society (with The Institute of British Geographers). This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | en_GB |
dc.subject | climate change | en_GB |
dc.subject | communication | en_GB |
dc.subject | engagement | en_GB |
dc.subject | image | en_GB |
dc.subject | polar bear | en_GB |
dc.subject | visual metonym | en_GB |
dc.title | Defining a visual metonym: A hauntological study of polar bear imagery in climate communication | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-29T14:22:25Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0020-2754 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available from Wiley via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1475-5661 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartof | Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2022-04-14 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2022-04-26 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2022-06-29T14:19:46Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2022-06-29T14:22:53Z | |
refterms.panel | C | en_GB |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2022-04-26 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 The Author. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Geographical Society (with The Institute of British Geographers). This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original work is properly cited.