Behavioural theories that have influenced the way health state preferences are elicited and interpreted: a bibliometric mapping analysis of the time trade-off method with VOSviewer visualization

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this paper is to develop an understanding of how behavioural theories have influenced the way preferences for health-related quality of life are elicited and interpreted. We focus on the Time Trade-off (TTO) method given it represents the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) concept – that survival in less-than-full health can be deemed equivalent to a shorter survival in full health. To our knowledge this is the first review using a combination of systematic review, bibliometrics and VOSviewer visualisation to map the development of ideas in health economics. Methods: A priori, we selected three behavioural theories to explore within our review, referred to here as Expected Utility Theory, Non-Expected Utility Theory and Probabilistic Choice Theory. A fourth topic, Order Effects, is defined broadly to encompass behavioural theories around timing/sequence of events. For the main search, Scopus was used to identify literature that had a) elicited TTO values and/or b) contributed to the way TTO values were elicited and interpreted, from inception to July 2021. Papers that focused on the latter category were given the label ‘behavioural’ and underwent additional analyses. A two stage-screening was applied to assess eligibility. Co-citation, co-authorship and co-occurrence of keywords was used to chart the development of TTO over time. Results: A total of 1,727 records were retrieved from Scopus and were supplemented by an additional 188 papers from Spencer et al. 2021 There were 856 applied and 280 behavioural papers included in the final corpus, with the behavioural set split equally into four sets of 70 papers to chart the development of keywords over time: 1) 1972-1999; 2) 2000-2010, 3) 2010-2015 and 4) 2015-2021. Discussion: The keyword analysis suggested that whilst some ideas transition quickly from economic theory to the TTO literature, such as the impact of Order Effects, others take longer to be assimilated, for example Non-Expected Utility models or failure of constant discounting. It is therefore important that researchers within health economics work more closely with those in mainstream economics and keep abreast of the wider economics and behavioural sciences to expedite the uptake of new and relevant ideas.