Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPrice, S
dc.contributor.authorLanda, P
dc.contributor.authorMujica-Mota, R
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, W
dc.contributor.authorSpencer, A
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-06T14:40:37Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-08
dc.date.updated2022-07-06T13:44:26Z
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Exploring the impact of revising suspected-cancer referral guidelines on primary care contacts and costs. Methods: Participants had incident cancer (colorectal: n=2,000; ovary: n=763; pancreas: n=597) codes in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink or England cancer registry. Difference-indifferences analyses explored guideline impacts on contact days and non-zero costs between the first cancer feature and diagnosis. Participants were controls (“Old-NICE”), or “New-NICE” if their index feature was introduced during guideline revision. Model assumptions were inspected visually and by falsification tests. Sensitivity analyses re-classified participants who subsequently presented with feature(s) in the original guidelines as “Old-NICE”. For colorectal cancer, sensitivity analysis (n=3,481) adjusted for multimorbidity burden. Results: Median (interquartile range) contact days and costs were: 4 (2–7) and £117.69 (£53.23- £206.65) for colorectal; 5 (3-9) and £156.92 (£78.46-£272.29) for ovary, and 7 (4-13) and £230.64 (£120.78-£408.34) for pancreas. Revising ovary guidelines may have decreased contact days (incidence rate ratio 0.74, 95%CI 0.55-1.00, p=0.05) with unchanged costs, but parallel trends assumptions were violated. Costs decreased by 13% (equivalent to -£28.05, -£50.43 to - £5.67) after colorectal guidance revision, but only in sensitivity analyses adjusting for multimorbidity. Contact days and costs remained unchanged after pancreas guidance revision. Conclusions: The main analyses of symptomatic patients suggested that pre-diagnosis primary care costs remained unchanged after guidance revision for pancreatic cancer. For colorectal cancer, contact days and costs decreased in analyses adjusting for multimorbidity. Revising ovarian cancer guidelines may have decreased primary care contact days but not costs, suggesting increased resource-use intensity; however, there is evidence of confounding.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipCancer Research UKen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 8 August 2022en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jval.2022.06.017
dc.identifier.grantnumberC56843/A21550en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberC8640/A23385en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberPR-PRU-1217-21601en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/130172
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-2228-2374 (Price, Sarah)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights© 2022, International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.subjectEarly cancer diagnosisen_GB
dc.subjectPrimary careen_GB
dc.subjectSuspected-cancer policy revisionen_GB
dc.subjectDifference-in-differencesen_GB
dc.titleRevising the suspected-cancer guidelines: Impacts on patients’ primary care contacts and costsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-07-06T14:40:37Z
dc.identifier.issn1524-4733
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1098-3015
dc.identifier.journalValue in Healthen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofValue in Health
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-06-29
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-06-29
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-07-06T13:44:32Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-10T10:22:57Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022, International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article
under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022, International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).